Good point, and I do know know that. I apologize for my assumption.

Anyways, don't you think congress is spending to much?

That is a very weak argument.

What if he did a worse job than bush, would he still be better in your judgment?

You didn't add any reasoning. How is he already better?

Your bias is showing.

How? it's easy. It's my opinion. What makes you think I am a blind follower? Even if I'm wrong about everything(which I'm not) that is still be my own personal opinion.

Reagan pulled us out of the rescission by lowering taxes, it also lead to the great economy that Clinton had. (and got credit for)

Obama's spending plan will hurt the economy in the long run, it will come back to hurt it.

Bush also hurt the economy by strategies just like Obama plans to. If we don't cut government spending and taxes this recession will last longer.

You seem to generally have the same opinions as the mainstream media. I could call you a blind parrot follower but I don't know you well enough to make such an assumption. So I ask you to have the same courtesy for me.

"Have you ever heard the expression that you need to spend money to make money?"

No I haven't, and it doesn't make much sense to me.

"I would have given the same to McCain because he would be facing the same things Obama is"

When have you ever defended a republican?

I'm not saying it's not true I just seriously want to know. Just curious.

And hey, why so serious? (:

"...to be fair, what we're really dealing with is someone else's leftovers."

Okay, thats fair, he's eating what the democrats running congress and senate left behind.

So he is eating the leftovers the wrong way, whatever it is he's doing it the wrong way.

"what would be the preferable alternative to bailing out the banks"

Hmmm. how about not bailing them out. If they fail, then they fail.

Oh you are so predictable, I understand Obama having a lot on his plate but he is eating his food the wrong way.

We need tax cuts and less spending. Is he doing that? No. The opposite.

I do admit that I can seem pretty biased. But I don't blindly follow anything. I can honestly say that.

At this point most intelligent people know that he is better at running for than he is at being the President. But most are too biased to realize or admit it.

Watch, before you know it, this debate will be filled with the "give him time, he just started" argument. Well we don't have time for that!

This country can't afford Barack Obama.