Debate Info

install flash for graphs

Tom Udall (D)


Steve Pearce (R)

Debate Score:346
Arguments:1
Total Votes:388
Ended:11/05/08
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
Show All Tags
 
 Udall (76)
 
 Pearce (62)
 
 High Fuel Costs (22)
 
 Real story (16)
 
 Domestic Drilling (8)
 
 equality (6)
 
 Rasmussen favorability polls (6)
 
 Tom Udall (6)
 
 Debate Schedule (5)
 
 Fiscal Conservation (5)
 
 Iraq war (5)
 
 Military (5)
 
 Udall In the cauldron of New Mexico (5)
 
 Corruption (4)
 
 Drill now (4)
 
 Pearce for progress (4)
 
 Udall Better Organized Than Pearce (4)
 
 Udall vs Pearce - experience (4)
 
 Abortion Rights (3)
 
 Cross-Party Support (3)
 
 Lack of Healthcare (3)
 
 Presidential Election (3)
 
 Real Freedom over Tradition (3)
 
 Republican Ad Cuts (3)
 
 Steve Pearce (3)
 
 The Dirty Dozen List (3)
 
 Poll Potentials (2)
 
 Bailout Objection Explanations (1)
 
 Closing In (1)
 
 Energy Defense (1)
 
 Harsh Words (1)
 
 Immigration Stance (1)
 
 Pearce Bailout Statement (1)
 
 the Valles Caldera (1)
 
 Udall in Valencia (1)
 
 Udall up and coming (1)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Who should I vote for in the 2008 New Mexico Senate Race?


CNN Election Coverage (www.cnn.com)


Tom Udall (D)

Side Score: 202
Winning Side!
VS.


Steve Pearce (R)

Side Score: 144

Arguments Tagged As: Harsh Words [clear]
No arguments found. Add one!
1 point  

Republican Rep. Steve Pearce delivered harsh words for Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson today and severely discredited Paulson's "objectivity in dealing with the current economic crisis", according to a report from The Hill.

Pearce called the Treasury Secretary a "fox in control of the hen house" and cited Paulson's former career as an executive of Goldman Sachs as evidence of his inability to objectively bring this crisis to an effective, productive solution.

Pearce claims, "Paulson was Chief Executive Officer at Goldman Sachs, one of the companies involved in creating the financial crisis. I don't think anyone should be confident that he will hold accountable those who got us into this, nor that he will institute the proper reforms to prevent it from happening again."*

With the market fallouts and bailout taking top priority in all political forums this week, such harsh words and poignant criticisms of the "Washington establishment" play well into the hands of GOP candidates hoping to build a wall between themselves and George W. Bush. This move is becoming more of a necessity for candidates aiming to grab more independent or centrist, fiscally conservative Democratic votes (they are out there) to add to their base.

Supporting Evidence: Harsh Words (thehill.com)
539 days ago | Tagged As: Harsh Words
Popular Debates in Politics: Should the Ten Commandments be displayed in public schools? The Atomic Bomb: Was dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima & Nagasaki the right decision? Should abortions be publicly funded?



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2010 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.