If there is anything that the whole New Mexico should be looking out for, it is the search for that candidate who is proven and with the up-to-the task attitude armed with a brilliant background as far as the available history is all about. This however, is not in support of Pearce. According to Heather Wilson who had previously declared her candidacy in the race, through her campaign organization claimed, "Pearce violated House ethics by urging those he called to contact him through his official, non-campaign phone number or check out his official, non-campaign Web site." If this is really true, can he (Pearce) be entrusted with national responsibilities that the Senate entails?

Polls can be misleading and it's important for the reader to determine their validity or lack thereof. In contrast to the recent NewsMax poll discussed above, Udall is strongly favored, leading Pearce 59 percent to 34 percent in a Rasmussen Reports poll conducted July 24.

Anti- Pearce

The enactment of the policies that regulate the health sector is under the supervision of the senate. In a bill that would have provided health benefit to children- the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), Pearce went totally against it. It’s like he would still sustain his positions, especially when it has to do with the health of children which is really an issue that is not debatable- its either you are for or against and Pearce, by his vote, went against it.

(R) Steve Pearce is said to be 'on the fence' as to his attendance at the upcoming Republican National Convention in Minnesota, according to a spokesman. NationalJournal.com reports there are a handful of Republican representatives and senators who may not be in attendance at the convention, sighting a variety of reasons including personal engagements, campaign obligations and more. (D) Tom Udall has committed to attend the Democratic Party convention in Denver. Bloggers have already jumped on the news of Pearce's possible absence (http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=1786) as a sign he may not be as loyal to the Republican Party and John McCain as conservatives had hoped.

According to Congresspedia (SourceWatch.com), Tom Udall has supported the American Immigration Lawyers Association which is admired by Democrats and favors to the left. He does not support conservative supported U.S. Border Control. Udall does not support tightened border security nor does he want state and local governments having the power to investigate and prosecute illegal immigrant cases.

Steve Pearce (R) has no intentions of changing his conservative views. In an interview with KOB-TV/KOB.com, Pearce stated, "This is not something that I do for elections, this is something that I'm compelling others because of my beliefs." Sticking to his conservative roots is something Pearce strongly believes, and the full article can be found at the link below.

According to local NBC affiliate KOB-TV, (R) Steve Pearce has been conservative in his campaign approach thus far due to limited financial resources. KOB reports Pearce carries an account balance of $500,000 while his opponent, (D) Tom Udall, has resources in excess of $3 million dollars. Republican insiders supposedly predict Pearce will 'come out swinging' soon and take on Udall on a variety of issues. Pearce will have his chance, as Udall has recently challenged him to three televised debates.

Pearce has received the endorsement of National Right to Life (NRLC) because he "has compiled a 100% pro-life voting record," and Udall is pro-choice. NRLC does not want New Mexico to lose the Republican Senate seat held by pro-life Senator Pete Domenici, who is retiring.

To a lot of individuals especially Republicans, Pearce is their favorite choice but his background does not show him off as a saint. For example, he had a short romance with plagiarism, which ultimately led to the resignation of his press secretary. How sure are we that he has nothing to do with and that he is not taking it to the Senate from where the presidential candidates are now emerging?

Congressman Pearce sponsored a bill to offer incentives to military personnel that are ready to retire. The members of the Armed Forces that opt to stay in to receive the incentives will be given non-combat positions. If you were a member of the Armed Forces about to retire, and you would be guarantied to not face anymore combat, would you stay in? How much of an incentive would you need?

Most of Steve Pearce's energy bills are revolving around different fuel methods. Pearce recently sponsored a bill to help Americans bare the financial burden of the natural fuel. To solar panel a house is around $18,000, which is the equivalent of another car, most people cannot afford that. Will the tax benefits be enough for people to convert?

Steve Pearce is supportive of the Iraq War. Pearce's website highlight tactical changes like closing the border, and he argues the instability and genocide that will ensue should we with drawl our troops. One of the items he does not raise is the financial aspect. Will he assist next term's President if Iraq troop with drawl is determined?

Following the legacy of the Udall family that set aside acres of land for the public and for national parks, conservation is a top priority for Tom Udall. However, in a time when such a large percent of New Mexico's citizens are struggling with higher gas prices, Steve Pearce, who once owned an oil field services company, has attacked Tom Udall on his voting record against expanded oil drilling. Udall has since responded by saying, "We are not opposed to good sound development, but there cannot be carelessness and recklessness in the use of resources." In the coming months Pearce will certainly try to frame the issue by saying Udall has consistently voted against expanding New Mexico's economy.

According to a column by Chris Cillizza on the Washington Post's Politics Blog, the NM Senate race may be determined by money rather than a debate over the issues. According to Cillizza's July 18th post, Udall's campaign had $2.9 million at the end of June, while Pearce was left with only $533,000 after a tough primary battle against Rep. Heather Wilson. Cillizza writes, "In a cycle where national Republicans are in no position to come to Pearce's financial rescue this one is looking more and more like a done deal every day."

(R) Steve Pearce is under enormous pressure to win New Mexico's soon-to-be vacated seat. According to the Majority Rules Blog (Objective Disclosure: This is a pro-Democratic blog site), the Republican Party is defending 22 seats in the 2008 elections, The Democratic Party is defending 12. Also, the Republicans must win 23 of the total 34 contests in order to regain control of the Senate.