Debate Info

install flash for graphs

Tom Udall (D)


Steve Pearce (R)

Debate Score:346
Arguments:6
Total Votes:388
Ended:11/05/08
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
Show All Tags
 
 Udall (76)
 
 Pearce (62)
 
 High Fuel Costs (22)
 
 Real story (16)
 
 Domestic Drilling (8)
 
 equality (6)
 
 Rasmussen favorability polls (6)
 
 Tom Udall (6)
 
 Debate Schedule (5)
 
 Fiscal Conservation (5)
 
 Iraq war (5)
 
 Military (5)
 
 Udall In the cauldron of New Mexico (5)
 
 Corruption (4)
 
 Drill now (4)
 
 Pearce for progress (4)
 
 Udall Better Organized Than Pearce (4)
 
 Udall vs Pearce - experience (4)
 
 Abortion Rights (3)
 
 Cross-Party Support (3)
 
 Lack of Healthcare (3)
 
 Presidential Election (3)
 
 Real Freedom over Tradition (3)
 
 Republican Ad Cuts (3)
 
 Steve Pearce (3)
 
 The Dirty Dozen List (3)
 
 Poll Potentials (2)
 
 Bailout Objection Explanations (1)
 
 Closing In (1)
 
 Energy Defense (1)
 
 Harsh Words (1)
 
 Immigration Stance (1)
 
 Pearce Bailout Statement (1)
 
 the Valles Caldera (1)
 
 Udall in Valencia (1)
 
 Udall up and coming (1)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Who should I vote for in the 2008 New Mexico Senate Race?


CNN Election Coverage (www.cnn.com)


Tom Udall (D)

Side Score: 202
Winning Side!
VS.


Steve Pearce (R)

Side Score: 144

Arguments Tagged As: High Fuel Costs [clear]
4 points

Tom Udall is a candidate who likes to meet with constituents in order to get firsthand knowledge of their concerns.

Recently, Udall met with citizens in a round table discussion at a local gas station to discuss the rising cost of fuel. Udall spoke of possible solutions including responsible drilling, cracking down on hedge fund speculators and price gouging and adopting stronger fuel efficiency standards. He also talked about a higher gas tax saying it wasn't a feasible solution at this time.

Udall seems genuinely concerned about higher fuel costs and the impact it is having on citizens.

Supporting Evidence: Tom Udall Says He Feels Your Pain (newmexicoindependent.com)
478 days ago | Tagged As: High Fuel Costs
3 points

A recently published poll shows the majority of Western U.S. voters (including those in New Mexico) feel urgent action is needed to reduce oil consumption and global warming emissions. (D) Tom Udall strongly supports alternate energy/fuel technologies in step with these voters' concerns. See the poll by visiting the following link:

Supporting Evidence: Western Voter Poll (www.ucsusa.org)
477 days ago | Tagged As: High Fuel Costs
3 points

Going through Udall's official website, he made a statement that "Under the Bush Administration, we have seen gas prices, food prices, health care costs, and the price of a college education increase dramatically. And who is bearing the brunt of all this? New Mexico’s middle class. We need change and we need it now. That’s why I’m running for U.S. Senate. We have to get back to doing what’s right for this country and what’s right for New Mexico." Does he really know what he is going to do as a Senator or is he just pointing accusing fingers to the Bush's administration just like any Tom, Dick and Harry is doing these days?

Supporting Evidence: Tom Udall's economy Page (www.tomudall.com)
478 days ago | Tagged As: High Fuel Costs
4 points

(D) Tom Udall is said to "point the finger" at the oil speculators as well in a recent article in the National Journal. (Also mentioned in other arguments on Pearce's side.) As Shelly mentioned above, Udall has mentioned the Bush Administration as a cause along with Big Oil. This does call Udall's qualifications into question if he does not provide solutions in step with accusations and complaints.

Supporting Evidence: Pointing the Finger Again (adspotlight.nationaljournal.com)
477 days ago | Tagged As: High Fuel Costs
4 points

(R) Steve Pearce is absolutely in favor of increased drilling and speculation as an immediate fix to the gasoline price issue concerning many of his New Mexican constituents. "The cure in the short term is to drill in Alaska and off the Florida Coast. ... We can't continue like this," Pearce said in a recent Daily Times article. Pearce's rational is rooted in the fact that something must be done to effect the short term outcome.

Supporting Evidence: Daily Times 7/22 Interview (www.daily-times.com)
477 days ago | Tagged As: High Fuel Costs
4 points

Rep. Pearce believes that the answer to affordable gasoline is grounded in Benjamin Franklin’s practical world. In answer to Udall’s complaints about speculation driving up the price Pearce looks to the “reason” for the speculation. “Speculators are just reacting to the current economic climate and Washington's unwillingness to open more oil fields in the U.S.” “Speculators only act on human behavior--they think right now human behavior in the congress says no to any more drilling. It's gonna drive the price up," he said. Pearce isn’t looking to speculation about speculators. He’s looking to the practical answer. All conduct has some rational basis to it. Drill now and the price will go down, even before any oil is recovered.

Supporting Evidence: Eyewitness News. Channel KOB (election.kob.com)
477 days ago | Tagged As: High Fuel Costs
Popular Debates in Politics: Which side has more "bigots"? Will Obama win in 2012? Obama and socialism



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2009 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.