Debate Info

install flash for graphs

Tom Udall (D)


Steve Pearce (R)

Debate Score:346
Arguments:2
Total Votes:388
Ended:11/05/08
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
Show All Tags
 
 Udall (76)
 
 Pearce (62)
 
 High Fuel Costs (22)
 
 Real story (16)
 
 Domestic Drilling (8)
 
 equality (6)
 
 Rasmussen favorability polls (6)
 
 Tom Udall (6)
 
 Debate Schedule (5)
 
 Fiscal Conservation (5)
 
 Iraq war (5)
 
 Military (5)
 
 Udall In the cauldron of New Mexico (5)
 
 Corruption (4)
 
 Drill now (4)
 
 Pearce for progress (4)
 
 Udall Better Organized Than Pearce (4)
 
 Udall vs Pearce - experience (4)
 
 Abortion Rights (3)
 
 Cross-Party Support (3)
 
 Lack of Healthcare (3)
 
 Presidential Election (3)
 
 Real Freedom over Tradition (3)
 
 Republican Ad Cuts (3)
 
 Steve Pearce (3)
 
 The Dirty Dozen List (3)
 
 Poll Potentials (2)
 
 Bailout Objection Explanations (1)
 
 Closing In (1)
 
 Energy Defense (1)
 
 Harsh Words (1)
 
 Immigration Stance (1)
 
 Pearce Bailout Statement (1)
 
 the Valles Caldera (1)
 
 Udall in Valencia (1)
 
 Udall up and coming (1)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Who should I vote for in the 2008 New Mexico Senate Race?


CNN Election Coverage (www.cnn.com)


Tom Udall (D)

Side Score: 202
Winning Side!
VS.


Steve Pearce (R)

Side Score: 144

Arguments Tagged As: Domestic Drilling [clear]
4 points

According to the HuffingtonPost.com, (R) Steve Pearce has received a considerable amount of money from oil lobbyists, a little over $200,000. Exxon-Mobil revealed on July 31 they had earned a profit for the first six months of 2008 to the tune of $22.57 billion, or $4.25 a share. Udall has an opportunity to spin this fact in his favor in the upcoming televised debates.

Supporting Evidence: Big Oil contributes to candidates. (www.huffingtonpost.com)
477 days ago | Tagged As: Domestic Drilling
4 points

This is footage of Steve Pearce arguing against H.R. 6515: Drill Responsibly in Leased Lands Act of 2008. The bill was introduced on 7/16/08. Pearce argued against it on 7/17/08, and it failed passage that same day. Pearce argues that the bill is redundant and inhibitory, doubling up on existing procedural rules and creating more red tape that will prevent drilling for domestic oil. Toward the end of his argument, Pearce states "I believe that this bill is not going to increase the amount of domestic energy one bit. I believe it is going to start new processes and delay even by months the process in place right now for the NPRA (National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska)."

Pearce arguing against HR 6515 on House floor

478 days ago | Tagged As: Domestic Drilling
Popular Debates in Politics: Will Obama win in 2012? Which side has more "bigots"? Obama and socialism



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2009 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.