What is this?

This is a collection of graphs and information about the debate. For clarity, only the top three positions (tags) are presented in graphs.

Language Grade Level uses the Flesh-Kincaid Readability Grade Level formula.

Debate Statistics for Should the Obamas accept this dog?
view debate

Side scores:
 
Yes, he's adorable. : 6

 
No, he's horrid. : 5

 
i don't care : 2

Total arguments:
 
No, he's horrid. : 3

 
Yes, he's adorable. : 3

 
i don't care : 2

Word lengths:
 
No, he's horrid. : 4.33 ave

 
Yes, he's adorable. : 4.08 ave

 
i don't care : 4.02 ave



Language grade level:
Flesh-Kincaid Readability Grade Level
 
No, he's horrid. : 9th

 
Yes, he's adorable. : 10th

 
i don't care : 6th

Vocabulary overlap:
 
No, he's horrid.

 
Yes, he's adorable.

 
i don't care

Total words used:
 
No, he's horrid. : 109

 
Yes, he's adorable. : 225

 
i don't care : 54



Word frequencies:
affectionate  also  articleperuvian  bring  bringing  care  country's  debate  dog  dogs  don't  family  fly  gone  hair  hairless  heck  house  i'd  ignore  isn't  just  kind  know  little  looks  me  mean  much  normally  obama's  per  personality  rather  really  robust  should  strangersi  take  that's  thing  think  took  type  very  want  wary  white  why  wikipedia
Latest Twitter posts about debate topics
loading Loading twitter data
more results



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2010 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.