One government and currency wouldn't really make sense for the religions that are extremely different.

I totally agree. Palestinians, being some of the only people to never leave, lived in peace before the Jews came back forcefully kicking them out. The Jews were gone for so long, so why should they get most of the land upon arrival?

Sure, the Jews did go through many tragedies, but we shouldn't give them the land out of pity. Yes, they developed the land, but they just up and left in large numbers expecting no one to call "dibs" on the now open land. Upon suddenly coming back and forcing people from their homes, the Jews just don't really play a fair game.

I agree, however, I would like to make a few changes. Both Israelis and Palestinians have done good to the land, and in order to separate it so both religions have the same equal chances, we might want to think about the shape of the land. It should be separated so the Palestinians and Israelis both have equal amounts of land near the water (which could be used for agriculture) and dry land. I believe the lower half has many mountains, so Israel, being the first people to develop and defend the land would get the short end of the stick.

I don't believe that the Jews should get the land just because they are pitied. They should rightfully deserve to live Palestine.

Arab Muslims have always been living in Palestine and never left in large groups like the Jews did. They were dedicated to claiming the land as theirs, developing it over time. Therefore, they should get half of the land as well as the Jews. Instead of splitting the land straight down the middle though, they would get equally some land near water, and the drier parts.

The Jews began settling and developing the land as far back as records show. Additionally, they successfully defended the country from by winning several wars. Therefore, half of the land, both dry land and near the coast, should belong to the Jews.