Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 11 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 95% |
Arguments: | 10 |
Debates: | 0 |
I agree that their evidence shouldn't be based on religion either because people have different religions that say different ideas. One religion might say the land belongs to the Jews but another may say it belongs to the Arabs. So the decision of who should get the land should be based on physical evidence instead.
I believe the land of Jerusalem should be neutral between the two groups. This is because Jerusalem is a holy place for both Muslims and Jews so it should be shared. If the land isn't shared then war will occur about who should get the holy place. War won't solve this conflict only make it worse.
I think the Arabs should get a little bit over half of the land. This will give the Arabs and the Jews what they want. The Arabs will get more land which will lead to less fighting for land and the Jews will get peace because the Arabs will stop fighting for more land.
Although Arabs stayed in Israel while the Jews left, rightfully the land still belong to the Jews. Israeli people have been given the land by the United Nations in 1948 and defend the land they own. So even if the Arabs have lived there the longest it doesn't mean the land rightfully belongs to them.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |