CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS 2Joints

Reward Points:23
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
84%
Arguments:17
Debates:4
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

“LA LA LA! I CANT HEAR YOU I CANT HEAR YOU!”

Yeah, you’re brilliant.

I'm sure that would be very hurtful if you weren't the one ignoring my arguments and saying idiotic things to the point where I feel that attempting to reason with you is futile.

0 points

I don't disagree with you, I just thought I'd downvote it out of spite.

1 point

What was that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of being way better than you in every way.

Goodbye rectal sausage.

1 point

In a debate about Marx, you literally couldn't even refer to anything he said even once. So you lost.

Ask any Marxist who's right about Marx and they'll choose me, because I am a Marxist who has studied Marx. Sorry bro, but I've got commie cred, you just have quotes from the internet that you don't understand in a Marxist context because you were told what to think about communism long before you ever started cherry picking quotes about it.

1 point

You are retarded though, I literally may as well be speaking about quantum physics to my chihuahua.

1 point

You can't even answer questions about what you think.

It's not that I can't. I just need you to in some way indicate that you are capable of understanding anything whatsoever. Until then I might as well explain it to a dog.

1 point

I'm a capitalist. Those aren't the correct answers.

That's what capitalism is. What makes you think you can understand the way the future will work when you look at the present and think it's a perfect utopia that will never change?

1 point

Reason may be objective, but the most reasonable path for human action depends on values. You cannot reasonably determine what is reasonable for every aspect of other people's value structures.

In the first sentence you say reason is objective, but your second sentence claims that what is reasonable changes based on whatever subjective values shape someone's outlook. This is because your values are not aligned with reason or objective truth, they are based in the subjective. But since mine are aligned with reason I know that subjective cultural values are not valid unless reason is what they value in and of itself. You see it as a tyranny to be correct because you value opinions and superstitions, I see at as a tyranny to perpetuate opinions and superstitions because I value facts and reality. You see it as an issue of individual choice, but it is all to obvious to one who has the IQ befitting of a human being that the values you speak of which go against reason are not a choice, they are dangerous cultural programming that is perpetuated in human cultures rather than critical thinking skills because humans are type 0 ape monkeys who live in conceptual worlds of bullshit.

Furthermore, no one person has at there disposal all necessary information. This is why reasonable people disagree.

That's why we need socialism, there will be much more think tanking and information pooling.

1 point

If there were entire societies predicated on this idea, it would behoove us to teach people about them.

That doesn't change the fact that it is fucking retarded.

This is awesome. You literally don't know what integrity means.

You think that having a society based on the rule of whoever has the most money is morally and logically superior though. You're a joke.

2 points

How is need determined?

By the amount of money someone has.

If resources are not sufficient to supply everyone, who decides who gets what?

Money.

Reasonable people can disagree. Whose reason do we rely on?

Money decides who's reason you rely on.

Those would be my answers if I was a capitalist, in order to even begin to understand socialism, you first need to be not retarded enough to understand the problems created by the above.

Displaying 4 most recent debates.

Winning Position: morality
Winning Position: How can you deny that America is fundamentally corrupt?
Winning Position: Do you miss Obama?
Winning Position: Unresolved

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here