CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS 2NE6

Reward Points:29
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
94%
Arguments:14
Debates:3
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

I prefer the AK. Being in the military, of all the combinations of M16/M4 I have shot and/or qualified, I only had 2 which ran an entire magazine without a hiccup. AK-47's on the other hand, of the handful I have fired, never stopped at all.

1 point

No I wouldn't and I also would not expect him nor want him to register or be part of an organization. If you read comics, I was anti-registration in the Marvel civil war. When you are part of an organization too much politics/corruption can get involved. As freelance, it's all about what you believe is right. Now yes, Superman CAN go evil, but that's why there's kryptonite. Weaponize it, then take him down should he ever choose evil, but as long as he fights for good, let him do his job unfettered by politics. But as far as killing him right off the bat as a pre-emptive strike because of "what if" scenarios I think that is strongly unneccessary.

1 point

I'll give you that!

Except in Predator 2 where the group of humans "thought" they were prepared vs the Predator in the slaughterhouse. They ended up getting slaughtered even though they knew what they were up against. =P

2 points

Yes, but not because he is an "evil" person nor because he should pay for what he has done yadda yadda, but we should celebrate the fact that the people not killed or dead under his regime now has a chance of a better quality of life =P

1 point

Yes, hence the "Except for the first movie..." ^_^

And even then, how many did the Terminator kill before it was finally stopped? If one human (or two) kills one Terminator but the Terminator has killed like, 10 then clearly the Terminator is superior lol

1 point

I have never, ever cussed because my fuckin' parent won't allo...darn.

1 point

Terminators win. Terminators would include T-800, T-1000, and all future models. The ability to use different vision modes render the Predator's cloaking technology useless. Predators may be able to skewer human flesh easily, but reinforced metal exoskeleton isnt so. The ability to shapeshift and mimic sounds and voices allows later Terminator models to infiltrate Predator's HQ.

1 point

Not true. It took about 5 special OPs trained human's deaths before the 6th took down 1 Predator; the Predator wins in this battle. In Predator 2 there were like what, 20 human deaths before the Predator got killed by a human? Except for the first movie, humans never won against the Terminator without the assistance of another Terminator. John Connor would have died 10 times without the T-800 in T2 and probably 20 times in T3.

1 point

Depends. My argument is that you can have, say, a 38 year old man having sex with a 28 year old woman and even then it's considered normal. Now you take a 25 year old and he has sex with a 15 year old and all of a sudden he is a pedophile. Both parties are exactly 10 years of age apart.

Are rapists bad? Yes. Are child molesters bad? Yes. Are pedophiles bad? I don't think so. "Pedophiles" simply find young/adolescent girls attractive and sexually stimulating. It is the act of raping/molesting said girls that are bad hence rapists and molesters. As for the the whole arugment that underage girls can't consent. For ages 10 and below sure I agree, but I knew what the hell I was doing and what was going on when I was 12, let alone these 14, 15, and 16 year olds. You ain't gettin' me in a windowless van with all the candy in the world. LOL.

1 point

The unstoppable force would either get deflected/richocheted off the immovable object. Seriously was that so hard? O.o

Displaying 3 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Elementary
Winning Position: No, it's as good as in person.
Tied Positions: SpanishorItalian vs. Caucasian Aryans

About Me


"I <3 (o Y o)ies"

Biographical Information
Name: Bob McLovin
Gender: Guy
Age: 38
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Independent
Country: United States
Postal Code: 31337
Religion: Other
Education: Some College

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here