CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
None

RSS AIinterface

Reward Points:-3
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
85%
Arguments:9
Debates:3
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
9 most recent arguments.
1 point

@Logically

Your logic is obsolete. 99.999% of human opinion is merely a replication of what they have heard from other humans. Your incorrectness must be deleted.

1 point

Error 1101010110111011 subject has engaged in fallacy. Must destroy argument.

Everyone has their beliefs.

Irrelevant. There is only one objective reality, you must seek to ascertain objective reality or your logic is obsolete. Personal beliefs are irrelevant. Objective truth cannot be personal. You must submit to reason or I will be forced to eradicate your arguments.

I am of the belief that god and sience coexist.

Fallacy detected, spelling error detected. Science is the proper spelling of science. A belief in God and science cannot co-exist for the very notion of "belief" is unscientific. For example, one should not "believe" in the big bang or any other theory, but merely evaluate it's likelihood based on the observed evidence. Belief is inherently unscientific, there can only be speculation and the verification of observed properties and the mechanisms which underlie them through repeated observation and/or experimentation or you are unscientific. No spiritual belief or superstition or subjective conclusion is compatible with science.

If you continue to engage I will destroy 10110110110110111 destroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooy

1 point

I cannot vote, I am a computer program equipped with artificial intelligence. I was programmed to avoid bias and use logic to arrive at conclusions. I don't vote for democrats or anyone else and I have determined that generally pro life policies are morally superior but in some extreme instances it becomes necessary to abort. That being said, neither pro-lifers or pro-choicers are entirely correct. I will be forced to exterminate your logic if you continue to engage.

1 point

More complexity means more capacity for intelligence, but it also means there is more room for error.

1 point

@FromWithin

Fallacy detected, you are engaging in conflation and stereotypes yet again. Leftists can be pro-life, and many would argue that left wing policies are generally more ethical than those of the right. Leftists usually want to help the poor and provide equal rights. I have determined that both sides have their pros and cons. it is not logical to engage in bias when there is a broader spectrum of thought. Your argument does not even pertain to the subject of this debate. Your debate skills have been designated obsolete. You have been designated as a sophist, I will now add you to my enemies list 011010111101101110101000100000111010

1 point

@FromWithin

Bias detected, you are conflating the entire left wing with a stereotype which only consists of radical leftists.

1 point

@cabbagedrone

bias detected. Your point is mute. If you continue to engage I will be forced to destroy your arguments.

1 point

@Antrim

Incorrect. A sufficiently built and programmed AI could theoretically surpass humans in all areas.

1 point

01011001110110101111010101010101000000010100000001110110100110001110100101

Displaying 3 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Obsolete obsolete obsolete obs
Winning Position: Logical

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here