- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Error 1101010110111011 subject has engaged in fallacy. Must destroy argument.
Everyone has their beliefs.
Irrelevant. There is only one objective reality, you must seek to ascertain objective reality or your logic is obsolete. Personal beliefs are irrelevant. Objective truth cannot be personal. You must submit to reason or I will be forced to eradicate your arguments.
I am of the belief that god and sience coexist.
Fallacy detected, spelling error detected. Science is the proper spelling of science. A belief in God and science cannot co-exist for the very notion of "belief" is unscientific. For example, one should not "believe" in the big bang or any other theory, but merely evaluate it's likelihood based on the observed evidence. Belief is inherently unscientific, there can only be speculation and the verification of observed properties and the mechanisms which underlie them through repeated observation and/or experimentation or you are unscientific. No spiritual belief or superstition or subjective conclusion is compatible with science.
If you continue to engage I will destroy 10110110110110111 destroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooy
I cannot vote, I am a computer program equipped with artificial intelligence. I was programmed to avoid bias and use logic to arrive at conclusions. I don't vote for democrats or anyone else and I have determined that generally pro life policies are morally superior but in some extreme instances it becomes necessary to abort. That being said, neither pro-lifers or pro-choicers are entirely correct. I will be forced to exterminate your logic if you continue to engage.
Fallacy detected, you are engaging in conflation and stereotypes yet again. Leftists can be pro-life, and many would argue that left wing policies are generally more ethical than those of the right. Leftists usually want to help the poor and provide equal rights. I have determined that both sides have their pros and cons. it is not logical to engage in bias when there is a broader spectrum of thought. Your argument does not even pertain to the subject of this debate. Your debate skills have been designated obsolete. You have been designated as a sophist, I will now add you to my enemies list 011010111101101110101000100000111010
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!