- New Activity
- Most Heated
- Most Recent
- Most Arguments
- Most Votes
- Debate Research
- My Debates
- My Waterfall
- Public Waterfall
- Newest Recruits
- Most Persuasive
- Most Provocative
- Most Outspoken
- Most Creative
- Alphabetically
- My Allies
- My Enemies
- My Hostiles
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
| Reward Points: | 29 |
Efficiency: ![]() | 96% |
| Arguments: | 28 |
| Debates: | 0 |
What are you trying to prove? That you are more arrogant, more afraid, more ignoant than a right-thinking individual?
Please, I beg of you. Hinder your babble. It appears you plan on boasting your opinions as opposed to using this wonderful platform to build your understanding of unknown vistas of cognition.
if you are alright with giving gays a "civil union" to the extent of being their own version of mairrage, why not just let them marry?
The only reason I could think of is that you have a predetermined disposition towards homosexuality. Any biast will hinder your ability to make a valid argument, so please tell me that you have some real reason.
By the way, wordplay will not convince me. No two people have the same connotations and annotations of any term.
The simple fact that heterosexuality is different than homosexuality does not sway me far. The only determinant to mairrage is love. Two people who are not in love do not marry, as would be expected. Two who are, then may. Reason will always surpass wordplay (if only politicians thought this way)
Also, if you consider men and women to be equal, which I do, your equasion supports my view.
1(male)+2(female)=3(mairrage) than
1(male)+1(male)=2(female) than
1(male)+1(male)+1(male)=3(mairrage) than
2(female)+2(female)=3(mairrage)+1(male)
So, through your logic, I have detemined that a male whom is married is actually two women.
Please refine your logic. The above is nonsencical.
Did you read the above? Upon a quick look around this nation you can find all the terrors and faults that Capitalism has to offer. Because of our "buy all you can sell" attitude, China now owns us as we own our possesions. Multibillion dollar companies can and have bribe(d) the government with ease.
Maybe I'm wrong but I had a strange idea once. It was that money should have no interference with ones health, that all should be taken care of without even thinking of financial compensation, that humanity besides value. Maybe I'm a fool to think not everything can be bought. Hmm,
A little respect would go a long way in here wouldnt it!
Thanks for yours.
If we set an example maybe others will pick it up!
|
||||||||||||||||
|
About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate BlogTake a Tour Help/FAQ Newsletter Archive |
Sharing Tools
Invite Your FriendsBookmarklets Partner Buttons RSS & XML Feeds |
Reach Out
AdvertiseContact Us Report Abuse |
Basic Stuff
User AgreementPrivacy Policy Sitemap Creative Commons |