The ignorant one, when we choose evil, we do it because it will help someone or something. Therefore, there is no evil. Only those at the disavantage will label things as evil because it does not help them.

The role of women has evolved (or devoled), into the personification of a weak individual, needing protection and baised looks for our heroics to act upon. To simply say they can't be setup as breeding machines is just our heroics attempting to place value in order to recieve a mate. Women can be used to progress the human race, but the time for it to take is less than thieir obglitory responsibilities to make childen to carry on the human race.

Disallowing abortions under the assumptions that the fetus has a right to life being that it is a creature in a parasitic relationship, and the host has no rights, is pure controlling, no matter how holy it seems. Besides moral argument given, you can look at the fetus as any other animal. If I kill an animal to make my life better, be it defence, or else. Am I evil?

You are saying we should punish those that steal, by cutting off the arm they stole with. Besides that, the sex offender laws are too vague. If a 17 year old has intercourse in agreement with an 18 year old, the 18 year old is now a sex offender. The punishment you propose does not fit the crime. Even rapists do not deserve it on grounds that what he did, didn't hurt her by cutting limb off. Yes she is hurt mentally, but not too the point where it will not heal. A severed limb however will not heal.

Blaming the fast food industry for our lack of control doesn't seem very conclusive to help us. When the public has a scape goat, they want it to be burned at the stake. If the goverment go appease the people to gain popularity, it will do that. The goverment shouldn't be allowed, because the hate for fast food is out of ignorance.

The classification of something violent is too vague. You can classify something such as a Mario because he kills turtles and uses them as a weapon. By saying video games encourage violence is simply saying the kids cannot discern truth from reality. If this was true, we would have more outbreaks of voilence.

Yes and no, In a idealistic world, the man would sacrifice himself and the other would live to be productive members of society. However since we are living in a realistic world, the man would have equal right to kill you simply because you decided to take his life without his consent.