Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 90% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
No. Animals should be able to be kept in their natural habitat. They are WILD ANIMALS and can be very dangerous even in their natural habitat. Here is a link that backs my point saying this is a bad idea: http://www.bornfreeusa.org/
Testing on animals can be looked upon as cruel but it’s an easy and good way of allowing us to know that products are okay for humans. If we didn’t have animal testing, we wouldn’t have all of the products we do. Although there is alternatives to testing products, animal testing is the easiest.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |