CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Antrim

Reward Points:1247
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
88%
Arguments:2184
Debates:22
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:
Right Now

Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
Antrim(1247) Clarified
1 point

That's perfectly fine and I understand what you mean.

I salute President Trump's strategy of trying to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons and feel that everyone in the free world, regardless of their political views, should congratulate him on the progress he has made so far.

Despite being ambushed at every junction, and betrayed by those whom he considered to be his allies, President Trump continues to pursue the important domestic and international issues which were ignored for so long by previous administrations.

Instead of making self-serving, noble sounding orations to address the nation's problems President Trump is DOING something positive.

2 points

As that would leave our potential adversaries China, Russia, Pakistan and possibly at some point in the not so distant future, Iran with nuclear weapons while we go for unilateral nuclear disarmament I assume your question is asked with tongue in cheek.

Should this be the case then I find your sense of humour not particularly amusing.

If however you really are serious may I suggest you make an urgent appointment with your nearest psychiatric clinic.

1 point

She went against the stream of standard hypocritical eulogies.

Most tributes to the dead such as;--- he/she donated so much of their life to helping others and and should be commended for being a wonderful humanitarian, should end, providing they're really dead that is.

1 point

Due to the uncontrolled immigration policies of most European countries and the ensuing influx of millions of Muslims who are already asserting their customs and practices, such as the barbaric Sharia law, on the frightened indigenous populations, I can see, at best, violent civil disorder, and at worst bloody revolution in such nations as France and Germany.

As a consequence of the British motto, surrender first and ask questions afterwards the U.K., will avoid internal conflict but will have been bloodlessy subjugated by the forces of Islam.

The United State's efforts to pay off it's astronomical national debt will be rendered nigh impossible as a result of the eye-watering cost of attempting to keep the black and Latin American violent crime rates at acceptable levels.

The journey to WESTERN DECLINE and ANARCHY started as far back as the 1960s when incredible shortsightedness by the loony left politicians and an apathetic public who were incapable of recognising where they were being led.

This lemming like journey to the cliff's edge continues to this day as the bleeding heart brigade successfully labels anyone who expresses concern over the real dangers of unregulated immigration as xenophobic racists.

1 point

Lough as in Lough Neagh, Strangford Lough and Carlingford Lough is the Irish, and correct spelling of a large body of landlocked water or a protected bay.

Even though the Scots abbreviated the word lough a few centuries ago, the spelling Loch it is nevertheless incorrect.

Both spellings are variants of the English word, Lake.

I bet you won the fight, a one footed biped wouldn't be much use in an arse kicking competition.

1 point

I feel it is most definitely racism.

Why should one section of a society have to identify their ethnic background when others don't?

If for whatever reason the authorities consider that such information is necessary then in the interests of equality all citizens should is required to declare their national origins, i.e., Irish, English and so forth.

1 point

On the positive;- it rhymes and the syllables of each line pretty well match.

On the negative;- it is morose, depressing self-pitying bullshit.

1 point

Insofar that a single footed, creature, or a critter with one big foot and one small foot, could be easily caught and/or tracked the whole mythical nonsense of this fictitious character should be classified along with other storybook figures such as Batman and Spiderman.

Or perhaps more fitting, The Lough Ness Monster.

It could make a good movie;-Bigfoot meets the Lough Ness Monster.

4 points

If, as I assume you're referring to illegal immigrants then they should have the same rights as any other criminal.

Illegal is defined as ''contrary to, or forbidden by law'', so in this context they are, by definition, criminals.

Bronto quite rightly states that if we permit unregulated illegal immigration we could be swamped with hostile fifth columnists.

The concern is, how de we know that this hasn't already happened?

2 points

His irrational rant is proof positive that this piece of brainless filth is a cross between a stark-ravening lunatic and a rabble rousing anti-Semitic racist.

It doesn't augur well for the future stability of the United States if phlegm-bergs such as Farrakhan is part of the Nation's law making process.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: No, blacks can shoot blacks vs. Yes, blacks can't shoot blacks
Winning Position: Yes, more positive.
Winning Position: No,only consenting adults.
Winning Position: If they're in love,yes.
Winning Position: American accents.
Winning Position: Yes, peace and tranquility.
Winning Position: Does Christianity depend on the insanity of it's followers?
Winning Position: Yes, they could be cured.
Winning Position: Internment would save lives

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: Angola
Religion: Agnostic

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here