Actually there is reference to this being a wrongful act.

Playing with dolls is for children, before menzies and there are passages that suggest you're not supposed to have sex with them.

Ayshas testimony says she had a doll in hand when her mother got her from her swing to present her to the prophet.

So this explicity says that she didnt have her menzies and the consumation shouldnt have taken place. This adds even more to the crime of which muhammad did.

Good job Muaquana, they cant refute their own doctrine from sites that dictate that doctrine.

He must have faith to beleive mud man wasnt a pedo, and A WHOLE LOT OF IT !

Mary could have gotten pregnant in a couple of ways and still have been a virgin.

No god thing needed.

However what is more believable is that she was knocked up before marriage and that the whole thing was covered up with the BS of this god thing making her pregnant so she wouldnt be STONED TO DEATH.

Stop by the DEBATE FAITH rooms for more if you like.

I have to go to the negitive the way the title is phrased.

With that said, the teaching of all religious dogmas should be introduced in HS, by saying religious doctrine might suggest a specific doctrine vs all, or lets say a large varity of the myths.

We can see in many HSs in the US that teachers take it upon themselves to go a step or two further in such classes, actually preaching instead of showing what the dogmas are and why they're in place.

Remember DEBATE FAITH 24/7 is always around at stickam

Once again you bring a failed argument ...

I have read some of the koran, hadith, and have met muslims in RL and on the internet. The internet is where you find the truths about islamics, all too many are extreme in their rhetoric and are eager to spout threatening remarks and hateful things toward men and women.

I never said I didnt like you, its obvious I dont like the islamic religion. You come right out and say you dont like me, once again, the religion of piece taught you this, right ... Oh and you really know who I am. FAIL

The shrouding of islam is not the covering up of any peaceful natures, quite the opposite. Narrations and huge volumes of text have been destroyed about the so called prophet. His murderous campaigns have been slanted, distorted, or completely erased to try and preserve some assemblage of modesty to the religion.

I seem to have the history of islam, however you seem to pick and choose what you want to believe vs the truth of the matter.

oh the arabic argument ...

Well do you understand arabic ? Did your prophet speak arabic ? The same arabic as you do ? Did the words back then mean the same as they do now ?

My sources may be crap, after all they are the koran and the hadith.

Here's how your analogy fails, may sources are unbiased islamic sources, your talking about someones mother as a whore is typically a muzzie tactic of lashing out at those that oppose islam.

So you think that just by not blatantly saying my mother was a whore you can skirt from the wrath of al la ha ha lol i thought it was all knowing lol

oh and your prophet is insulting enough on its own, I really dont need to insult it, his actions are quite evident

Do you know what the koran or hadith is ?

Those are the documents used, please read them if you can stomach them.

lol Pascals wager, hardly worth thinking about when you consider how many other god things were thought up before yours. Your chances of picking the right god thing are pretty slim, so your more than likely to be pissing off some god thing than pleasing one with your desire to be its slave for all of time.

But you are right, it wont make a difference since there never were any gods, nor shall there ever be.

You go right ahead and waste the only life you have, just dont bother me with the details or waste a beautiful landscape with outlines of islamic architecture

lol a sock account ?

When you make sock accounts you're not supposed to make them obvious lol

You dont think so ?????

Care to cite why ?