Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
This is exactly what we don't know...
This is how I like to look at it:
The answer to all our questions is 101.
Scientific theory = 50
Scientific experiments proving these theories = 50
Scientists say that we have reached 100 and that we just need to find out the 1
Religious scripture = 0 (means nothing)
Their belief = 0 (means nothing)
A bunch of made up evidence that isn't coherent = 0
Religious people say that 0+0+0=101 and that they have worked everything out.
There is, quite literally, no way to determine whether something exists or not when it is not a physical being. If I was to tell you that there was a large invisible carrot orbiting the Earth, you would find it impossible to prove me wrong. What we can do, however, is prove various claims made in holy books wrong- thus ruining their validity. The Quran says that water does not mix with salt water (25.53) and we can prove this wrong, thus ruining the validity of this source. The bible says that the earth is flat (40.22) and we can prove this wrong, thus ruining its validity.
To surmise, it is utterly impossible to disprove the existence of God but you can render whatever tells us that he exists useless.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |