- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Debate Communities
- Research Feeds
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- Persuasive People
- Provocative People
- Outspoken People
- Creative People
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
| Reward Points: | 20 |
Efficiency: ![]() | 89% |
| Arguments: | 12 |
| Debates: | 0 |
A human body should never be subject to the laws or regulations of any outside entity, which means that prostitution should definitely be legalized. What a person chooses to do with his or her body is his or her own business, not the government's. Besides, the government putting a ban on something very rarely solves the problem it was trying to solve in the first place (e.g. alcohol, drugs, guns, gambling, and prostitution for that matter...). Prohibition should be the last thing the check off the list. Legalizing, regulating, and taxing prostitution will bring in some extra money for the government (which we all know it needs) and will reduce the swelling prison population by removing inmates who committed victimless crimes.
If McCain wins this election, I will have lost all faith in the American public. McCain's policies are almost identical to Bush's, and since Bush's approval ratings are down near 30%, you would expect Obama to win in a landslide. But of course, the average American has no clue as to what is going on, so it will end up being much closer than it ever should be.
The stimulus package will do nothing. Americans will use it to relieve some of their record credit card debt, not to spend it on new fancy toys. Even if they do actually put it back into the economy, $600 a person isn't going to do jack. And as for the rate cuts, those are in fact making our economy worse, not better. The Fed has been cutting rates for years, and nothing has gotten better. All the cuts do is create more inflation, which is exactly what we don't need.
I was going to say we're headed for a recession anyway, but the other choice makes mine the default anyway. There's no way in hell the Federal Reserve has this under control. Their solution to everything is to lower interest rates -> to lower interest rates the Fed has to print more money -> more money means more inflation since our currency isn't backed by anything -> we are left with a higher inflation rate than before, which was our problem in the first place! To say the Fed has this under control is like saying Rush Limbaugh has a liberal slant: it just isn't true.
Apple will eventually hold the majority market share over PC due to its much bigger pension for innovation and security. Macs are built on UNIX, an infinitely more stable OS than Windows. Steve Jobs also happens to be a marketing genius, compared to Microsoft who has basically been running on auto-pilot for the past 10 years.
The government has no place dealing with this, or even the economy at all. If we wanted that we should have just let the USSR take us over. This is how capitalism works; some businesses thrive, some fail, and some thrive then fail. It is not and never should be up to the government to regulate the economy.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate BlogTake a Tour Help/FAQ Newsletter Archive |
Sharing Tools
Invite Your FriendsBookmarklets Partner Buttons RSS & XML Feeds |
Reach Out
AdvertiseContact Us Report Abuse |
Basic Stuff
User AgreementPrivacy Policy Sitemap Creative Commons |