- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Personally i think the world ending in 2012 is ridicules, if the world was going to end it would be a surprise and no one would no about it, we wouldn't be able to be prepared.
Also the would has been predicted to end over 3 times and look we are still here!!!!
I don't think this is any exception. But thats just my opinion
i agree, it is we that it is ridicules that we have gotten so into controlling stuff that now we even have a way to control natural courses, but i guess like i said before if it is to stop your child from suffering a sickness then i guess that is okay (still bad) but better than just being a complete control freak, or being selfish
Even though this says i am for, Personally i am neither.
I understand you would want to choose your child's gender if you have a genetic sickness that would just effect a specific gender, and it would make the quantities of abortions lower because some people abort because they want a certain gender. Or other things
But also it has a very high chance of causing birth defects and problems. Which will cost you even more money in the long run, and there are just so many more other things, but i am kinda in the middle of For and Against because it depends on your purpose of doing it.
This isnt what we are talking about and you know it, What we are talking about is a serious problem where defensless animals are being treated horribly and having things done to them that no human would ever want done to them
So again i say why do we do it to them??
Plus you dont have to use animals for testing, there are alternatives like computer programs that use Serum, DNA and other stuff to predict what the out come of the product is.
There is also something called Human Testing, but it is not on acuall humans it is on human cells, so no one is hurt and they can see how the human would react from it.
About CreateDebateThe CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Sharing ToolsInvite Your Friends
RSS & XML Feeds
Basic StuffUser Agreement