110%. Seriously, majority of what they do is just noise anyway. It's incompetent. They've even picked on YouTubers! News is suppose to be fact, not opinion. We didn't ask for your 2 cents, so don't give it to people. I wonder who even watches them anyway? They talk so bad about Obama, well if that's the case, why don't they try running for President?

There are people who put actual thought and time into their arguments and they deserve actual points. But why reward people who spam on purpose with no thought or effort? I think this is honestly unfair.

Because Science relies on hard, evidence based facts and not on faith. And also considering that in most places people have different religions, you'd definitely run into conflict. You can say "God created the world" in a science, but people would ask questions, and without any solid evidence can you really get people to believe you?

1. Guns kill Children

How many kids need to die before we get it?

2. Protect against what?

In some cases, the killer has taken the victim's gun and killed them.

3. It's outdated.

Seriously, when this law was written the were no automatic machine guns, the guns were heavy and hard to use, Native Americas were still attacking, and Slavery was still legal.

4. Humans "Flight or Fight" response.

You're more likely to defend yourself with a kitchen knife than running all the way to your safe and doing the combination, you'd be a goner.

5. Guns kill more people than any other weapon, and are a lot harder to defend against.

You way way more likely to survive one stab wound physically unharmed than a gun shot wound. Plus, you still have a chance to defend yourself against a knife, how do you defend yourself against a gun?