- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
You have no evidence. You had no evidence before, and you have no evidence now. I can't keep explaining to you why you don't have what you say you have because you demonstrate that you know you don't have it. You just won't admit it. So, I can't help you. Sorry.
You have to ignore a multitude of facts in order to conclude they were "wrong" instead of intentionally dishonest in the first place.
Those are the facts I am asking you for.
You have not mentioned that the government controlled the 9/11 investigation from the beginning,
That's because I asked you for your evidence. What's more shocking is that you haven't mentioned that yet.
created a commission which was "set up to fail" (according to two different commission members),
We already discussed this.
ignored dozens of eye witness statements
You have actually provided no evidence for this.
failed to conduct a single test for explosives residue.
You have created an alternative reality where none of this actually happened
False. I asked you for your information and you have me nothing.
You can't arbitrarily pick and choose which bits of information you acknowledge in order to make your theory sound better.
Aww, are you claiming the monopoly on that?
If someone says they know something and they don't know it, then they have LIED.
That is not the kind of lying that constitutes a cover up.
But there was demonstrably no transparency in this particular situation.
They won't let you see data about WTC 7 so there is no transparency. You are ridiculous.
There are precise systems in place for the investigation of domestic crime in the United States, and the government actively prevented these investigations from taking place, instead choosing to implement its own.
If that is what you believe then "evidence" is the third word we have stumbled across during this conversation which you seemingly do not understand the meaning of.
You have already been destroyed for claiming I don't know what the word lying means. How fucking stupid to you have to be to keep accusing me of not knowing words?
an intentionally false statement.
If you find out the government was wrong about something you don't have any information about what their intentions were.
The government has been telling the public how the buildings went down for the last 16 years, so your assertion is contrary to what they themselves have claimed repeatedly.
So, if someone says they know something that means they definitely know it?
The entire purpose of a cover up is to make sure the information you have (i.e. distribute to the public) supports the cover up.
Ok, but that is also the exact purpose of transparency. If they are right it is not a cover up, and if they are wrong it is a cover up? That's not how cover ups work by definition.
You are using extremely blatant circular reasoning.
No, I was just pointing out facts.
If the government wanted to cover something up, they would ensure the "information they have" supports the cover up
And if they didn't want to cover something up, they would still release information that supports them. You are just begging the question.
This is evidenced particularly well in the fact that no government agency conducted any tests for explosives residue at Ground Zero, despite (literally) dozens of reports of explosions, explosives and "secondary devices" in the towers.
This is your first piece of evidence. Why was it so hard for you to give me the evidence?
You haven't presented any evidence that the government lied about anything. You don't know how the buildings went down. The government doesn't know how the buildings went down. If the government acts against the information they have it is a cover up. If they act on information they have and you don't agree that's just the government being the government. That happens to 50% of the population on every issue. Go fuck yourself you nut job.