CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Crashley

Reward Points:14
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:10
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
Crashley(14) Clarified
1 point

If you are for it then you shouldn't be debating my points but if you are against it you shouldn't be debating those arguments. Since you have been arguing both sides am I to presume you have no opinion on the matter and you are just trying to bait people?

1 point

I'm not withdrawing from the debate. Which side are you debating for, do you believe siblings should be allowed to marry or do you think they shouldn't?

Crashley(14) Clarified
1 point

I was meaning the sibling incest law. Also when you get into the reproduction part of incest you are delving into eugenics and I don't feel the need to debate that issue.

Crashley(14) Clarified
1 point

Sorry this should not be a question, I was making a statement. Didn't mean to put the question mark in.

1 point

The reason then that this law is still in place is because people have not demanded it to be changed?

1 point

That is your interpretation of that verse, I interpret to mean something else.

Crashley(14) Clarified
1 point

The laws are changing because people believe the government should not be able to dictate who two consenting adults can marry.

1 point

"But if any man thinks that he is behaving himself unseemly toward his virgin daughter, if she be past the flower of her age, and if need so requires, let him do what he will; he is not sinning; let them marryā€¯ (1 Corinthians 7:36)"

I am not asking the question of reproducing only one of marriage. By talking of reproduction that just brings eugenics into the equation.

Crashley(14) Clarified
1 point

In response to this then, my question also asked about brother/brother and sister/sister. Would it then be ok as long as they are of the same sex and cannot reproduce?

1 point

Equality for everyone As long as two consenting adults are in love and not harming anyone the government should not be able to tell anyone who they can or cannot marry. We are changing laws for same sex couples to get married why not siblings, brother/sister, brother/brother or sister/sister. The government needs to stay out of the bedrooms of people.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here