- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
List of Nom dupe accounts
I quoted NASA you stupid cunt. If you have a problem with NASA's interpretation of the facts then take it up with them.
Looking at all the facts is useful. You prefer not to.
Even if it is a guess, it's a guess being made by the people best qualified to make that guess.
The experts guessed the world was flat for thousands of years and that Einstein was wrong for decades.
Your theory that oil companies should be making that guess instead is... Flawed.
No one should be making a guess. You should show us actual data.
It is a specific defence of the fact that science says humans are causing climate change.
Interesting. So what caused it all of the other times?
Second, tell us the data you are referencing to give us the conclusion of a catastraphic event.
Third, tell us how we know that "normal" or "correct" is the temperature we see now.
Appeal to authority, and not even a specific defense of anything, because you don't even understand the topic. Likely means it's a big, whopping guess. That's why you never quote what these journals actually say, nor do you ever quote their data. You're full of shit, and don't know why because you are an idiot.
Nazism has nothing to do with archaic religion, which was your claim. Islam does have to do with archaic religion. You've created a red herring due to the fact that you can't defend the point.
I will now award Spuds an upvote and you a downvote for the fallacy.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!