i don't agree with you, I've got a lot of friends who are girls, and we're all good friends. i don't think that if you communicate with one girl close, it means that you love her.

i don't agree with you, I've got a lot of friends who are girls, and we're all good friends. i don't think that if you communicate with one girl close, it means that you love her.

i don't agree with you, I've got a lot of friends who are girls, and we're all good friends. i don't think that if you communicate with one girl close, it means that you love her.

i think it was discovered. there is no analog of mathematics. it is unique science. so is was discovered.

i agree to say that it makes our life harder, but it doesn't mean that people or scientists just didn't know what to do.

i don't agree with you. i think that money bring happiness. because when you earn money, you're happy, then when you're happy you want more happiness. and you start to look for it. finally you're happy.

Additionally, such types of work do not have harmful influence on women's health and they are able to have a baby.

I disagree with this statement. Because There is also the problem of pregnancies, definitely when "enlisted pregnancy rates jumped from 12 to 19 percent" (Donnelly) in only the past two years. Having combat situations jeopardized because a woman finds out she is pregnant during an extended combat mission would be totally counterproductive to any benefits. There is also the problem of soldiers who don't know they're pregnant yet who might put unnecessary stress on the unborn child in the most fragile early stages of the baby's life.

I don't think women should be forced into combat situations. I agree they weren't built for it emotionally or physically. If a woman wants to do it and the Army doesn't have a problem with it, I wouldn't forbid it, but I'm afraid once it's not against the rules women who don't want to be in combat may be forced to be. This will be especially bad if the draft is re instituted. I think mothers, especially, shouldn't be in combat zones, especially if their children are young. I think children need to have their mothers around during those years. It's one thing to be a working mom. It's another to be working on the other side of the world where you can't be home for the kids at night.

Women were made to be nurturers not fighters.

I can't even imagine why a woman would want to be in a combat role. There are too many differences between men and women for the roles to even be equal. Men were made to be stronger than women. Not that women are weak but in a combat situation I would trust a man to be able to fight and kill an enemy more than I would a woman. Today's world has turned upside down the roles of men and women. Women deserve equal pay and status in the business world but in war and combat women need to allow the men to be men.

Women should not be able to serve equal combat roles as armed forces because we need women in the world to do other things.

I believe that women should not be able to serve equal combat roles as men because there might be a shortage of women around the world. Already in China, there is an unequal ratio of men to women, and we need women to keep our human population going. Also, women need to be able to produce babies for this reason, and the only way they could do that is if they are 18+ years old. If a women decides to go fight the same combat roles as men in a time of war, we will lose a percentage of women worldwide, it is not like after the war only 10 women will die throughout the time of war.