CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS DavidJohnson

Reward Points:14
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
83%
Arguments:7
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
7 most recent arguments.
2 points

In America we teach our children to be independent

That is an untrue phrase. Not every American parent does that. My question actually was inspired from American stories / people.

And I agree with most of what you said after that.

But, I also meant not setting them a goal, but (for example's sake) 'Sitting down and deciding, "What shall our child do in the future? Follow in the family business? Doctor?" etc.' and then setting them goals towards that, when in fact the kid may be more interested in being an athlete etc.

2 points

What if there was a white man, similar in personality and looks (besides skin colour) to your black brother, for example.

Would you still dislike him then? Just because he is white?

You are only disliking white people because of their leaders. The majority. History. And propaganda.

You're not getting the topic. They're not asking if viewing it is wrong or not, but whether it hurts someone.

2 points

If they are 'structuring' them to a certain choice, then technically, if successful, they have decided their child's future? Because obviously they have decided this route before hand, otherwise they wouldn't be structuring?

4 points

I am a kid. Thanks very much.

I don't view it, it's wrong. I was simply just saying that strictly keeping to the exact question "Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?" it doesn't. Depending on the viewer, it can though.

But usually the viewer, is a paedophile. (N)

I completely agree with you. (agreeing with Swryght(34)) This is my view completely.

Plus, in my opinion - as with using the term 'gay' to mean something 'lame' or 'stupid', using the term 'blond' to mean a 'dumb/stupid person' is wrong. This was just not the topic.

2 points

Strictly the VIEWING does not hurt anyone. But I do not support it.

The creating however, very rarely doesn't hurt someone.

Unless of course the viewer is under a condition where it could harm them (e.g under age / mental illness)

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: Whenever vs. my opinion
Winning Position: No, they have their own life.

About Me


Biographical Information
Name: David Johnson
Gender: Male
Marital Status: In a Relationship
Political Party: Other
Country: United Kingdom
Religion: Atheist

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here