CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Dyst_22

Reward Points:4
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
79%
Arguments:4
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
1 point

The Articles of Confederation gave the states more power than they could handle. The states were like countries and the nation as a whole was like a continent with no order. Under the Articles, there was no unity between states, so there was no point of having a federal gov't to try to regulate with states. The Constitution gave the country a set of rules that would guarantee unity.

1 point

We should move to a new Constitution because the states had too much power, and it would be better if we split the power into three branches so nobody has too much power. A strong central government is the best way to govern our country. The constitution is the best way to protect the people's rights, so everyone can be treated equally. (Federalist)

Dyst_22(4) Clarified
1 point

It has been reported that Kim is backing away from firing the missiles at Guam. But even though pulled away from his decision , he could always have something up his sleeve. During this time, I feel as though it would be the perfect time to talk to him one on one without a lot of tension. Because in 1994, North Korea and the US sign an Agreed Framework under which Pyongyang commits to freezing its nuclear program in return for heavy fuel oil and two light-water nuclear reactors. So I feel as though they can make another agreement like this.

1 point

Dystaney- Option 3

I chose option 3 because I feel that it would be the best option, and also that if we talked to North Korea one on one, we could probably make a deal instead of waiting or doing something that would make the U.S. go to war with North Korea (also with their allies). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-bandow/us-should-talk-to-north-korea-whoever-is-in-charge b6240502.html This article also supports my side.

Dyst_22 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here