complacency is a consequence of the expectations so explanation is extremely necessary to link the keyword to the idea of complacency. If you don't deal with the keyword using direct synonyms or the exact word you have to explain the indirect synonym and how it links to the question.

Also draw the line on where the idea of medical science is limited to.

explain the assumption when you list it out and show why the assumption is false.

how people don't consider the time factor and resource factor when scientists try to find new classes of antibiotics

The ability of medical science to cure infections using antibiotics has led to a sense of complacency in antibiotic administration from the assumption that its misuse has no severe ramifications. We find that individuals all around the world have began overusing antibiotics with the expectation of it being the primary defence against infections leading to a rise in superbugs, deadly antibiotic resistant bacteria. There is a consistent undertone of properly utilising antibiotics because the population at large always assumes science to come up with new classes of antibiotics to replace those that do not work on resistant bacteria. In many countries, loose laws have allowed for the abuse of antibiotics amongst individuals such as in Thailand where no proper prescription is needed for antibiotic acquisition. Even in the agricultural sector, the government has been complacent in curbing antibiotic use amongst animals because they assume scientists will provide a safety net for resolution, proliferating the rise of dangerous superbugs amongst domesticated animals. On the individual level even despite regulation and education on antibiotic use, people continuously misuse antibiotics allowing for growing antibiotic resistance because they believe there will always be an alternative. Thus this shows how people from all classes place too much hope that science will be able to deal with antibiotic resistance on a whole, thus continuously misusing this drug.

Spoken language forms the ability for social interaction. When we meet individuals or get to know someone, we do not reach out to one another by writing but through the gift of speech. Through the conversations that we form with others, we find that both parties create first bonds using the fabric of speech. That of writing only suffices once we know an individual or where we work with an individual. Even if our writing fails us, the emotional attachment created through speech discounts our failures as the first impressions from speech allows us to conform to the norms of society thus resulting in social acceptance.

Need some examples. So in the event where you seek to educate but attract more people through entertaining, isn't your main objective to educate and your secondary objective to entertain

Question focus is on whether television is meant to educate or entertain and is not about the effect of entertainment. Individuals choosing certain channels over others show the pursuit of entertainment whether or not the channel is one for education or entertainment.