CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic


RSS Elvira

Reward Points:3446
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:3556
Debates:240
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

A gun doesn't protect from danger in any way near the same way the pill protects from pregnancy. You need to know how to use a gun for it to be effective. For that, you need continuous practice. A gun is also dangerous so it needs to be kept in a safe. All these things would also need to be paid for.

The point about cost was nothing to do with the gun analogy, anyway.

1 point

One thing is wrong with your argument. It isn't always possible to send your children to another school, especially if you're living in a rural area. Schools should not force children to observe a religion they don't understand or necessarily believe in. (And in the UK children are forced in some schools to sit in assembly and pray. These are state funded schools. I went to one. If the UK, a less religious country, has this problem then it's likely the US does too.)

1 point

Ah, do I really have to repeat myself?

I made 2 points.

One is that getting drunk is your own fault.

Another is that the government has the power to mitigate the consequences of getting drunk, or to prevent people from drinking so much they lose control.

These points address your entire argument about any occasion of getting drunk and doing something stupid because they are largely generalised.

Elvira(3446) Clarified
1 point

How else are things to get done?

Is there evidence that top-down restructuring does not work?

Elvira(3446) Clarified
1 point

I think that dangerous STI's such as AIDS are a million times more worrying than pregnancy. The emotional consequences can also be pretty harsh for some people and there are social consequences to consider also. Some people regard their reputation as more important than anything.

It wasn't a matter of being able to study 'comfortably' it was being able to study at all. I took time off school when I was on my period because of the pain being such a huge distraction that I would not be able to understand what is normally either easy or slightly challenging. It isn't my fault that I'm female or that I had overly painful periods and this clearly put me at a disadvantage for a few years. If not just one, but many, students are incapable of using +/-25% of their government-funded schooling time effectively, is this not a bad thing? For me, it was up to 1 week off school a month incapable of studying when it was at its worst. Painkillers would last up to an hour and then I would have to last another 3 hours before I could take another.

1 point

Have you ever considered this possibility?

Culture in Decline
1 point

Everybody makes stupid decisions. Some people get drunk. Other people refuse completely to walk the same way back as they came causing them to get hopelessly lost in the middle of the night (that would be me). I don't see how the pill encourages poor decisions. It doesn't remove all the consequences of sleeping with someone without a condom. It only removes 1 possible consequence.

1 point

Drunk driving has nothing to do with birth control so I did not address it. I try to keep on track... I try.

Since when did I say that it was not their fault! Read my previous argument because I'm not repeating myself! (Which applies to your entire argument)

1 point

I didn't say once that getting drunk wasn't someone's fault. Indeed, I said the exact opposite. What you seem to disagree with is that there are situations that make it more likely for people to drink: like unemployment, poor education etcetera. You seem to like stereotyping and ignore anything that doesn't fit in the little boxes. People are like electrons. They bounce around and do their own thing but they can be directed and controlled. When creating electronic devices, engineers try to make them as efficient as possible by reducing any resistance.

In many parts of the world access to birth control is a barrier. It is a barrier to women's equality and health. It is a barrier to the growth of the country. In developed countries access to birth control is also important. $20 a week is a lot of money. Condoms can be expensive, although if condoms were not available free I think more competition would drive the price down. The economic argument is simple. If free birth control encourages more people to use it, the state does not have to spend as much money and the people also have more disposable income which is good for the economy.

About the whole drunk thing, a lot of people get drunk regularly. The intelligence of their choice is not the subject of this debate. If a woman gets drunk and ends up sleeping with some random guy while on the pill: no pregnancy, no abortion, or no child in care. Or maybe she slept with her boyfriend, or even husband. Whoever it was, if she got pregnant and couldn't afford to keep another child the outcome is the same.

EDIT: Do you care so little for debating that you copy and paste your arguments?

Elvira(3446) Clarified
1 point

Kicked out when food stamp usage meats a trough or a peak.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Yes
Winning Position: For the worse
Winning Position: Tommorrow morning, it looks like Fox News will be a joke in the UK.
Winning Position: If we find aliens, what would be the creationist excuse?
Winning Position: Do TNCs have a responsoblity to combat modern slavery?
Winning Position: How dead would someone be if they tried to smuggle batches of 1984 into North Korea?
Winning Position: Unresolved

About Me


"Someone who does not appreciate being burned to death on a regular basis, and likes dried cranberries."

Biographical Information
Name: Elvira Fergussson
Gender: Female
Age: 22
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Green Party
Country: United Kingdom
Postal Code: Hedgehog
Religion: Other
Education: High School

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here