CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic


Hostiles
View All
None

RSS ForTheRight

Reward Points:9
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:18
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

If you would have cared to look, i have established several points as to why it is scientifically indisputable that abortion is murder.

1 point

Explain to me how one can be against abortion, yet not consider it to be murder...

1 point

Since you want to use the legal definition of murder, we can use the definition of murder as provided under section 18, U.S. Code ยง 1111. Murder is there defined as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought now there are some key-words we need to focus on, and those are killing of a human being, malice aforethought. the dictionary defines aforethought as previously in mind and malice as intent to do harm , and abortions aren't something you just decide one day that you are going to do like going to McDonald's for lunch. it requires prior planning, and most importantly, an appointment, which is a plan. Abortion does harm to the unborn, and as i have already established, an embryo is in fact a human being, and is indeed alive. So explain to me how you believe that abortion is not the killing of a human being with malicious forethought.

1 point

The hypocrisy in your statement was that in response to me calling you out on your ad hominem fallacy, you shifted the attention on someone else using a non sequitur, and used another ad hominem fallacy on top of that. Furthermore, you have no proof that the individual you were speaking of was or was not a person who fits the definition of that word. You also seem to have no argument for the topic we are debating here besides the one i have already shot down, you have simply, this entire time, been calling your opponents cretins and idiots, which is not an argument but a series of insults.

ForTheRight(9) Clarified
1 point

Adding this message was not only meant to apply just to you. the ad hominem fallacy example applies to everyone who uses it. I happen to know who you speak of, but i find it quite hypocritical of you to use this fallacy in response to my calling you out on it.

1 point

By your argument, you have committed the ad hominem fallacy in calling your opponent a cretin. I have noticed this quite a bit from your arguments, they seem to be all directed at the people who made the arguments, instead of the arguments themselves.

0 points

Genetically speaking, a fertilised embryo is still a human. You did state, and i quote that a growing embryo was a "A clump of some cells with no shape or unified purpose or ability to exist" but the problem is that if the so-called "clump of cells" that you speak of can exist, or there would be no way for us to reproduce, it just needs support from the mother to survive. the problem with your argument is that after the baby is born it is still helpless. Just because in the first few months of life, a human baby can barely lift its head, does not mean we have the right to kill it. Using that exact same argument, it could be justified that you could kill your baby AFTER it is born as well.

2 points

The arguments that you have presented are obviously based on a straw man fallacy. The argument is that the very moment an egg is conceived, it is then a human life. There is no point that can go against this seeing as there is no way to prove otherwise without bringing into the mix opinionated arguments. Genetically, the embryo is a HUMAN, it has 46 chromosomes, just like you and I

3 points

If you had cared to research your side, you will find that the "fetus is NOT part of the woman. it has a completely different set of DNA and chromosomes. When something is part of someone, it has the same DNA, and exact same DNA fingerprinting as the other tissues in the body.

2 points

You forget the definition of parasite. a parasite is an organism that lives and feeds on or in an organism of a different species and causes harm to its host. the key word there is harm. A human baby is not a parasite. Furthermore, a parasite is an organism involved in the symbiotic relationship of parasitism, which is defined as one organism benefits, while the other is harmed. Both organisms benefit, because the woman is having her species continued. You also have skewed the definition of human. A human being is a member of the species of homo sapien. Homo sapien is defined by a number of characteristics, one of which is the number of chromosomes in the cells, in a genetically normal human, there is 46. in a genetically normal "fetus," there are 46 chromosomes, and the DNA inside of these is genetically different than that of the mother.

ForTheRight has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here