Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 69 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 96% |
Arguments: | 47 |
Debates: | 5 |
I would agree that everything can be argued to be predetermined or predestined but not that I we are puppets.... that would suggest that a God is controlling us and our thoughts... and to that I pose the question if he controls us why make us think that he isnt if we cant do anything about it.
I would agree that everything can be argued to be predetermined or predestined but not that I we are puppets.... that would suggest that a God is controlling us and our thoughts... and to that I pose the question if he controls us why make us think that he isnt if we cant do anything about it.
Its not written like shakespear so why not. It's understandable for kids who cant read on a higher level but also helps them understand the human nature and make deeper connections that helps them in higher level thinking. It's a great book and should be read in junior high.
Well there isnt a way to enforce the over 16 age limit policy online because all they have to do is say their age is 17 or 18 or older and there isn't a way to check if its true or not. It's not like alcohol that can be monitered it's online where things can be manipulated by a nube to cyber space simply by doing the above. So whether or not they should or shouldn't, it really doesn't matter UNLESS parents are serious about them not being able to use it and strickly monitering their computer usage. Social networks aren't vital but still very popular for keeping touch with friends and sharing pictures and events such as trips and graduations. So the youth would be rebellious more than likely and find ways to use social site behidnd the parents backs which would in turn cause unneccasary problems with parents and children. I mean social networks aren't harmful for the mass majority of the youth today. Yes there are the few that do nothing but use social sites but the mass majority or at least the majority i know have social site accounts and are very active. If parents took the accounts away would the kids under the age of 16 get over it yes but it would be unnecassary unless those kids are on them excessively. So all in all kids under the age of 16 that are on them more than say 3 hrs at a time should be restricted to shorter and scheduled times, but taking them away completely is just stupid.
A school teaches a variety of different subjects because there are a
variety of different students with different goals in life. Yes if you have to goals then everything they teach will be useless in your life. But say you would like to be a historian then social studies, history, and some language courses could really help you. A mechanic.. math, science. Computer programer, math ect. If kids new what they wanted to be for cerain then they could probably give you more directed classes but unfortunately they dont know so they have to teach a wide range to all students.
lol indestructible metal is part of your arguement? you say it's impossible? So do you believe infinite strength and endurance is possible ? this is a debate between two ficitional characters, neither of which is possible. Though i do agree that hulk would win. The bones are indestructible but his joints aren't. Hulk could just rip wolverine apart to the point where wolverine couldn't regenerate.
|