CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS God_

Reward Points:507
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
95%
Arguments:305
Debates:57
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

I this instance it is quite clear what happened and it is just as clear what needs to happen. The officers should be indited and they deserve it.

1 point

agreed.

1 point

YOU'RE THE HYPOCRITE! : For talking about not copying debates and then copying! And he was not whining about the banning but commenting how you broke your own title by banning him thus making you a DOUBLE HYPOCRITE!

1 point

Her debate title was fallacious and blatantly broke it on multiple occasions: at least 2

Libprolifer:

I banned him by accident. How do I fix that? .

Me:

You've banned two already! and one of them was one who commented on the fact that you've broken your title... I don't think it was an accident: "There are no accidents" ~ Master Oogway

Overall her ability to maintain a statement of what she said she would do/ implied she would do is clearly false, showing her arrogance/stupidity (as they walk hand in hand)

0 points

You've banned two already! and one of them was one who commented on the fact that you've broken your title... I don't think it was an accident: "There are no accidents" ~ Master Oogway

1 point

Dumbass... didn't listen to a thing he said did you?

Besides this is a "No Banning" debate isn't it?

1 point

The beliefs and extremist actions of a few do not constitute the hatred of a whole.

1 point

1. Simplify the tax code. A flat tax rate.

2. Entitlement reform. Government employed doctors certify who is really unable to do any kind of work. Those recipients of welfare who can work must work to receive benefits.

4. End the war on drugs.

5. Eliminate deficit spending. Take Georgia for an example: implement a balanced budget law - constitutional amendment maybe?

6. Put an end gerrymandering.

7. Eliminate the US D.o.Edu.

8. Remove DOT and leave coordinating to the States.

God_(507) Clarified
1 point

How?_

1 point

I believe that in most cases applying this principle will result in a satisfactory, correct answer. This would apply to much of life, like everyday things (see GenericName's argument), but not to all of life, such as politics, romance, religion, etc. where it is common to have red herrings and other such objects of misdirection or interpretive implications.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Roku Streaming Stick
Winning Position: Sci-Fi
Winning Position: Wendy's
Winning Position: Shouldn't have been taken off
Winning Position: Mustard
Winning Position: Temple Run 1 or 2
Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: what is the best videogame?

About Me


Biographical Information
Name: God 
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Republican
Country: United States
Religion: Protestant

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here