This is one of the most irrational and worst arguments I've ever seen. First of all, both of the answers in this debate support one opinion, but I think this debate is totally wrong. You're saying there's never been a single white Pakistan male who has been charged with rape? In my opinion this is a racist and invalid argument that is basically a blind opinion.

This is honestly a hard topic to debate, even if it is one of the most simple statements to argue against. There's no evidence that he does 100% exist, yet there's no evidence that he doesn't either. However, a simple google or YouTube search about "To heaven a back stories," will bring up numerous results. To say that some of them are a complete lie, and are just posted for attention on YouTube especially is most likely correct. But to deny the reality of every single story where someone claims to have been in heaven momentarily is a very naive assumption. To deny the existence of God, you are denying every single article that has every been published, every single video, ministry, church building, and organization that was built in his name. First let me establish this before I go into my strongest point. Jesus and his apostles absolutely did exist. There is no debate there. The debate is whether he was really the son of God or not. Now it's a fair assumption to say the apostles were going along with Jesus to get attention, or fame; or maybe simply because they wanted to believe it was true. But if it was all a big joke, and the apostles new that it was a lie; they would not have given their own life up for it. If you are saying that God doesn't exist, you're claiming that the apostles died for a lie that they new wasn't true. The Roman government would have let them live if they simply said these words, "I denounce Jesus as the Son of God." But they didn't. They died for their faith. If that many people were welling to die rather than denounce there faith, I believe it was more than just a lie or opinion.