Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 13 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 6 |
Debates: | 3 |
By currently, you mean now (as in June 8, 2013, etc.), I suppose. And yes, it is. Though people are making improvements, I've heard that the concentration of CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) all around the world is nearing the 'point of no return,' and you can research this if you want.
As much as I hate to say it, I have to disagree to this one, even though I know they're harmful. Making cigarettes illegal would not really improve anything, and people might smuggle cigarettes or just buy them from some other country which has even worse effects.
Evolution, to me, makes more logical sense. Of course, that depends on what 'logical' means to you. Evolution, I suppose, is something that is very hard, and maybe even impossible to prove. But I can tell you that I believe this concept (almost all the time): The more you practice, the better you get at something. Same goes for evolution, except that the change is so much that it's visible. Still, I'm a kid, so I can easily say that I know very little compared to some others about both evolution and creationism.
Of course there is, in the English language. Just that something which is considered right by a person could be wrong to another person, and something which is wrong to a person could be right to another. For example, some certain scientists would believe that it is right to use animals for science experiments, but animal lovers would disagree.
|