Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
HellStay
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
| Arguments: | 3 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Socialized medicine doesn't work as great as many protractors claim in a debate versus an american. Because of the collective nature there's a disincentive to provide one's best. That's probably why those who are covered by healthcare in the US has access to the world's best
I have to reiterate the common position though I'm going to go beyond it. Atheism is the opposite of theism, a belief in a god. Thus if you do not actually believe in the existence of one, you're an atheist. Indeed, I'm pretty baffled why people bother so much with such an academic and philosophical detail about the limit of cognition. In everyday life the difference is nada, and IMHO is mostly a rhetorical trick to placate the theists. A softer position so to speak.
Personally, I'm an gnostic atheist and I believe it's the most open-minded and rational approach. Contrary? wait.
According to my dictionary a god is defined as: "— n
1. a supernatural being, who is worshipped as the controller of some part of the universe or some aspect of life in the world or is the personification of some force". Keyword supernatural. I believe that is a logical inconsistency. If there were a god he could be defined and measured, he would be natural, instead of supernatural.
Why for example is a god different than a powerful man if not for this fact?
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
