- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Good for thee, but not for me; classic liberalism. When Trump proposed sending all these illegals to sanctuary cities and states, the Liberal establishment in chorus chimed Trump is going to "dump" people in our state, but when they are sent elsewhere, it's called settlement of migrants. Why the difference?
Capitalism has killed more people than any ideology on earth.
No, totalitarianism and theocratic rule have.
The USSR was the fastest country that ever existed when it comes to going from a low status shit hole to a world superpower, and it did it with socialism.
The USSR rose through the enslavement of its people via totalitarian rule from a low-status shit hole to a superpower shit hole that is now defunct. I guess you forgot later.
You love capitalism because you inherited a vast sum of wealth without working for it.
No, Komrade, I got my piece of the pie by going out and getting it; it was not handed to me.
Furthermore, I leave you with the following:
"Silly poor people, money is for rich people."
Don't you forget it.
I'm not wrong at all. The Left is having conniptions over the prospect of these people being sent to their districts. They claim to love illegals and offer them sanctuary, so I can't understand their shock and dismay over Trump's willingness to accommodate them and send them their way.
YES! It's about time Trump n company got serious about the migration problem. The left is already up in arms about the idea. They don't really want these people any more than the right does, especially in THEIR backyards.
Trump should send them to Pelosi's, Schumer's and the other democrat's districts and neighborhoods and let them deal with it directly.
This is a capital idea!