- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Swashbuckler, you censoring fool you; what kind of Orwellian thought control wouldn't you love.
Your screed is off the charts and your examples are extreme. No one is talking about child porn, only you. I'm referring to adults, those that are the age of consent.
Who cares what I want? I do; that's what the topic of this conversation about: my opinion.
As far as the rest of your rant, I will let your comments speak for themselves. Your stance is exactly what we DON"T need.
Obscenity is subjective and in the eye of the beholder. Who wants some holy-roller, bible-thumping religious zealot telling you/us what to look at? Not me. Plus, if they can decide what's pornographic, what's to stop them from deciding what else you can't see. This is a slippery slope.
Consent is a non-issue; when being filmed "actors" know it will be viewed by untold numbers of people. The only consent needed is that from the actors when the film is made. That's like saying Meryl Streep needs consent from all who watch her movies- ridiculous!
Anything can have positive and negative effects on society; who wants a board of censors deciding what we should see. Go to China, N. Korea, Iran, Saudi et. al. and see what censorship does to them.