Agree! Because there are many examples to show that political unrest in a country can result in devasting consequences and since the locals would not be able to see clearly on what exactly to do at that point in time, a third party acting as the mediator would be able to help the country because what the foreign power sees is a bird's eye view.

SUPPORTTTT. Because chicken can evolve from other species, and before we got to know egg, there are other animals that existed and chicken can evolve from it.

Meaning:

Animal X -> Evolution -> Chicken -> Egg -> Chicken again.

BUT converse does not hold true.

Egg -> Chicken (????!!!!)

Good illustration of point with relevant examples. It is the traditional thinking that we can't change even after such a long period of time of revolution. Perhaps adding examples from the West or US will be better to show that even liberalised societies still have that same mindset?

Divorce rates may still be as high because even if there is an understanding of the opposite gender, the thinkings and trends of this era may be just continue forcing the divorce rates to increase.

Is there unequal treatment of women in Singapore? You are receiving education just as much as the boys here as the system here is based on merits, not gender. Perhaps you are referring to private companies who are not as willing to hire women for the fear of paying for maternity leave?

According to Chan Wai Leong, the gender revolution has become a norm in society today. Many people would have agreed with him as there is an increasing number of societies opening up to the idea of providing equal opportunites to women. Companies are more willing to hire female workers and schloarships are given based on merits, regardless of gender. In addition, empowering women is one of the UN Millienium Goals, thus, people agree with Chan Wai Leong's view that gender revolution is the norm today.

However, this is not true because women from countries in conservative societies such as India still suffer from discrimination. For example, in most Middle East countries, women cannot drive without men watching over them because they are deemed to be unsafe drivers. Moreover, women cannot be seen together with men alone, other than their husbands, fathers or brothers. This is due to the conventional thinking that it is an indecent act to be interacting with the opposite gender, and it only applies to women. With such restrictions and limited freedom, many women today still have to be very careful in their words and actions. Furthermore, inferring from the results of the US Presidential Election in 2008, there is a sense of insecurity in people to let a woman lead the country and hence Hilrary Clinton lost to Barrack Obama in the election.

Therefore, with discrimination against women in many parts of the world, even in a liberal society such as the US, how can we agree with the view that there is gender revolution occurring?