CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Instantgator

Reward Points:126
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
98%
Arguments:106
Debates:9
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.

It's not actually concurrence if you've failed to understand the point.

He ends up with more money because he didn't volunteer away 100$ dollars.

Any abilities the person possesses, is a part of their character.

You used debt as an example. I agreed that negative numbers can represent debt, but then argued that one can not actually have negative money.

Ad hominem is not only in the form of an insult, it is any irrelevant response which is directed at the person's character rather than their argument. You could be giving the person a compliment in response to their argument and it would still be an ad hominem.

That is a non sequitur. Ad hominems and truth are not mutually exclusive.

What logically follows from that response, is that there is no way to explain anything to anyone who doesn't have the understanding already. Which is clearly false, based on the fact that we have many mentors for many different subjects which have successfully educated many people, by explaining something to the people that they had not had the understanding of beforehand.

Ad hominems only show how battered and wounded you are from a loss that was inevitable.

That's not what I said. My argument is that you can't know if numbers have an end or not.

What may be the cause for those suspicions? outlaw60's behavior could be easily fabricated by anyone since it's completley one tracked, but I don't really know the behavior of the other two.

It's quite likely that Hellno saw the topic and wanted to discuss it, but was impeded by the sudden disposal of the topic and carried on to remake a similar discussion board.

But he didn't even try to make that apparent and simply came here to troll.

I concur, that he is randomdude.

Um, yeah. But when the idiot you are talking to doesn't get it he will call it a red herring.

More Projection.

Actually, technically I did by adding the word again

So you admit that you didn't prove that my argument is based on reality. Gotcha.

Nope. That's why we have negative numbers. If it were still 20 yards, you could get a first down by running in the wrong direction

What's why we have negative numbers? What is this "first down"? And why is it the "wrong direction"? Answer the questions? No red herrings.

No, that is literally the debate question

The issue at hand wasn't the debate question, the issue at hand was your reasoning that you used to answer the debate question. Therefore red herring.

No, bulldip is calling the debate question a red herring.

Your use of it as an argument, is the red herring.

You are half right. Which is about half more than usual.

75% of the time. I'll wear that with pride.

Displaying 9 most recent debates.

Tied Positions: Yes you are. vs. No I'm not.
Winning Position: What are your favorite subjects to discuss and why?
Winning Position: Is there a right way to debate?
Winning Position: Where is this "Gay Community"?
Tied Positions: Crocodile vs. Alligator
Winning Position: Crocs

About Me


"I was raised in the Louisiana swamps."

Biographical Information
Name: Krusheem Hawrd
Gender: grrrl
Age: 11
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Republican
Country: United States

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here