The USA has much more money in their budget than China does which allows them to buy more weapons than them. We also have 7200 warheads compared to China's 260. Lastly Usa has a better politics because they have so many more alliances with countries and that is way more powerful than control over your own people which America has just not as much.

Economy Winner: China

China will be the superpower of the future because the United States of America has lost manufacturing jobs and from the flood of Chinese export into their markets, China is becoming the world's manufacturing hub. They produce 5 times more STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) graduates than the US does

Military Winner: USA

USA will be the superpower of the future in military because the US has a higher budget than China which can allow the country to to buy more weapons and ammunition. The US currently has 7200 warheads oppose to China's 260 warheads and China has no chance to to catch up in that category.

Political Winner: USA

USA will be the future superpower in politics because they play a massive role in many alliances such as NATO and The World Bank. The US is also an entertainment giant producing the majority of the top 30 films in countries outside of its boarder. The USA also donates and helps a ton of foreign countries and have recently donated 30 billion dollars to countries in need of money.

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-us-vs-china-economy/

https://web.stanford.edu/group/sjir/6.1.03_miller.html

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/best-international-influence

I agree with your argument because if the USA did not drop the bombs and decided to invade Japan they were willing to put forth 28 million of their own people to fight the US which would have killed a lot more people on both sides of the fight.

The USA bombing Japan was a lucky break for them, if we did a land invasion Japan was willing to put forth 28 million citizens lives at stake to fight, I am positive more than 200,000 Japanese people would have been killed from if we did not bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The United states of America did the right thing by dropping bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the USA already lost 412,000 lives, both military and civilian and if they invaded Japan instead of bombing them, even more lives would be lost. Also, the USA was more interested in a quick and easy end to the war than causing untold suffering. They had in their hands a weapon that was capable of bringing the war to an end, and so they used it. The source is www.historyextra.com

I agree because if North Korea did anything to America it would be kind of harsh just to kill all of the innocent citizens who don't have the correct information about what is going on in the world and have no input on their country.

North korea's missiles are not yet strong enough to hit USA mainland and even if they were capable of hitting US territory, it would be a catastrophic mistake since the DPRK is simply fighting for survival and we would blow them up unhesitantly.

The United States of America should not be concerned about Kim Jong Un and North Korea because they are just fighting for survival and if they bombed or did anything to the U.S.A’s people or land, we would severely jeopardise the existence of the country. Also, right now North Korea’s nuclear programme is not strong enough yet to reach US mainland. http://www.aljazeera.com and http://www.bbc.com/news/world

I think that whoever this is accidentally put the argument on the wrong side, it sounds like it is for veto power.

I agree with these reasonings about not being a majority vote because if one of the 5 countries don't want something whatever they do not want does not happen.