- New Activity
- Most Heated
- Most Recent
- Most Arguments
- Most Votes
- Debate Research
- My Debates
- My Waterfall
- Public Waterfall
- Newest Recruits
- Most Persuasive
- Most Provocative
- Most Outspoken
- Most Creative
- Alphabetically
- My Allies
- My Enemies
- My Hostiles
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
| Reward Points: | 2564 |
Efficiency: ![]() | 81% |
| Arguments: | 2534 |
| Debates: | 202 |
Yes but I don't think it's this 'thing' that you can fall in and out of. When two people get married and keep their promises and do their part and work at it, they are a great example of what love is.
Love is more than attraction and romance, it takes hard work and sacrifice.
First of all I love the tags. Made me lol.
Anyways, as much as I hate cussing, with the technology we have it's getting easier and easier for parents to control what their kids watch. They can block certain shows and channels and even websites.
So no, I don't see why government should have anything to do with this.
I say the cable companies make a censor option. So that people can choose to sensor whatever they want. I can see cable companies making lots of money on that idea.
That way:
The economy is helped,
Kids don't hear cuss words. (unless their parents don't give a crap)
Parents don't have to worry.
People that like cussing can hear it.
And the government has to stick to the constitution and mind their own business.
Sounds good to me!
"There's no difference between saying all or most"
Yes there is.
"Have you met or spoken to most liberals?"
No. And that's not what I'm saying. This is only based on my experience. Of course I haven't talked to most liberals out there.
"You cannot pick one individual relationship that you have with someone and attempt to show that it proves you're not bigoted."
The difference is that I try not to be, I try to have at least some respect. I know I'm not perfect. And to make a point in a debate I don't need satire.
"In fact, this whole debate is an attack on liberals."
No, it's not. If anything it's a defensive move because conservatives are the ones that are always labeled as bigots. (including me several times on this site) So based on your argument every time a liberal says conservatives are bigots they are being hypocritical?
"And attacks disguised as debates (such as your initial argument in this debate) are not the same thing either."
Once again, the debate is not an attack. My arguments are separate from the debate it's self. Me being the creator of the debate gives my arguments no more power than yours or anyone else's. [you should know that by now] And your side will probably win anyways so I don't see what your so worried about.
"I'm pretty sure you disagree with me on this point, so please explain why anyone's beliefs deserve any respect without earning it?"
wtf? It's like you wan't me to think that so you can judge me for it. what part of "Your right you don't have to have respect." did you not get? Yes you ARE entitled to do all kinds of lame stupid things, have at it xaeon. Keep being a bigot.
"I do notice, though, that arguing with Conservatives is less frustrating than arguing with Liberals. Conservatives seem to actually care about what I'm saying and know it's all opinion. Liberals tend to really think that if you disagree with them you must be a fuckin' idiot.
But that's based on my experience."
So true.
"You're a conservative, and you've picked an entire group (liberals) to brand with the same label"
No, you're wrong. I never said that every liberal was a bigot. Or that every liberal attacks white people. A lot of them yes, but not all of them. Hence: "Which side has more "bigots"?" When I say that a lot of liberals are bigots, that's different than somebody saying that all Christians are idiots. Do you understand? Does that make any sense? Nice try.
"I attack Christianity (and other religions) no more than you attack Atheists."
There is a difference between criticism and straight up mocking and making fun of something. For example when you called God an "invisible sky daddy", you where being a bigot.
"And in your case, anyone who leans to the left."
That's not true, Thypyg is kind of a hybrid and leans to the left on some issues but I don't "attack" him. Same for anyone els, even liberals. Now I'm not perfect, sometimes I can be a jerk. But I have gotten better at not attacking people.
[please note that debating and attacking are not the same thing]
"Why do you presume that your beliefs deserve respect? You're certainly entitled to have them, but I absolutely do not have to respect them."
Your right you don't have to have respect. You even have the right to be a bigot. And you very often take advantage of those rights.
There are obviously seperate arguments that can be made against healthcare (such as yours about entitelment) and some of those make legitamte points. When it comes to your specific reason, I would say that healthcare should be a right, because ilness is not a persons fault. Obviously people shouldn't be entitled to free things at the expence of others when those things aren't necesarry to survive, but people aren't going to work harder just because they can't afford healthcare. They are either going to go bankrupt (medical bills are the number 1 reason for bankruptcy) or be forced to go without insurance and cross their fingers/pray that nothing happens, to them or their families.
By offering healthcare to needy citizens we aren't to entitle people to something they don't deserve, but only to provide one of the most basic of human nececities: medical care.
The job of satire is to exaggerate slightly in order to highlight the truth. Obviously most conservatives don't think that the government can't do anything, but oftentimes the argument made is that the government tends to screw things up more often then not, and this reason alone is enough to keep them out of healthcare.
I think kinda is a terrorist in the making. I have been to war with that dude he not worthy of conversation. He hopes that America fails and that the world will be a better place if it does. That' scary.
It looks like I cannot unban, I didn't realize it was permanent. I will remember this next time and give a fair warning before committing to an action.
I do apologize.
If an individual wishes to be patriotic they can do so through arguments. I created a debate, not a soundboard for random shouting.
When someone goes to a debate and announces: This is my position, no argument! They are not debating, and they can kindly go somewhere else.
I will unban you if you decide you'd like to contribute to a debate. I have a pretty low-threshold for what an argument is, Pyg passed after all.
Did you see the halarious skit on SnL Obama has done nothing. It was so funny but true. You know when SnL is starting to make fun of a left President something must be true.
Thanks man. It's amazing how many stupid people are in. glad to see that I have a least one allie. Did you see what Tip Top wrote? Pretty aweful. We need to put her in her place.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate BlogTake a Tour Help/FAQ Newsletter Archive |
Sharing Tools
Invite Your FriendsBookmarklets Partner Buttons RSS & XML Feeds |
Reach Out
AdvertiseContact Us Report Abuse |
Basic Stuff
User AgreementPrivacy Policy Sitemap Creative Commons |