Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS JatinNagpal

Reward Points:2566
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.

Don't worry about the honour. People don't read you in admiration, but in pity.

Ah, yes, we're sure about that. He's just a pathetic spammer.

The question here is rather, why he behaves that way.

Well, I'd expect more from beasts than him in reason.

Since he doesn't explain his exact problem, I'd rather not give him the benefit of doubt and should say that he, and his alt NowASaint (the similarities are simply decisive), is just a malicious idiot.

JatinNagpal(2566) Clarified
1 point

This is a semantical difference. I distinguish conscious/unconscious differently than voluntary/involuntary. You have put them together.

It's actually "subconscious" rather than "unconscious", a distinction that arises when looking closely but fades from afar. Subconscious is all involuntary thoughts, when conscious is all understandable+voluntary ones. Unconscious are the nonunderstandable thoughts to the conscious monitor, such as internal bodily processes.

This sounds like a compatibilist position.

As a materialist, you can't attribute your control to things from which you are isolated. An immaterialist and a duelist can do that, for you have completely different criteria for the "self" that can effectively separate it from its material causes and effects.

I said that not learning language at all hinders one’s ability to later learn language at all. That part of the brain where language occurs needs to be utilized and conditioned within a certain span of time, or else it can hardly develop at all.

It seems contradictory. First, you say that it's hindered. Then you say that it can hardly develop at all. Earlier, you had used only the latter claim.

There is no reason to believe that higher level math could develop without the fundamental language having first been established, not only because it would be meaningless, but because many, if not most, higher math concepts arose as a result of working with the language of fundamental math.

It's unlikely, and, of course, wouldn't be the conceptual branch as I said, but merely consisting of particulars. It's still possible, though, but without language and learning, it will generally be pretty primitive.

Though the parts of advanced pure maths which are not pragmatic enough to notice even for particulars will stay unnoticed.

I won't needlessly bring it up when arguing with Christians. That, pretty much, means that about all debates on this website are about Christianity.

It is because of power i'm not catholic. Satan sits where ever world power is. That is not christ followership.

Not like you don't want Christus to be in power.

Any religion that can be used against the state is an unsafe one. One could claim to be your messiah and make you people revolt. That is, incidentally, about exactly what happened 2000 years ago. If it wasn't for Nero burning them on crucifixions, they'd have been given more power sooner.

In whiich book do you find the synonym for chimp to be 'I'.

I don't need to.

Its not fair the way you shift blame in times of difficulty. You never complained till now. Very convenient.

I wasn't complaining, but just wondering if it's a better option to make the unsafe religious nuts yield or just dispose them off. The whole point of such religion is to try to escape torture, so they will submit sooner or later if given the choice to. There's a reason I called it The Purgatory.

You always claim to be rational. Is that the normal in your rational world? Then even hope can't save you. I mean why would a monkey suddenly go fuck a pig? And also how many of them? All of them?

Yes, it's normal. Interbreeding and hybrids are normal in evolution...that's how it works, after all. I'd guess that you can still breed with a real chimp if you prefer so. Not a pig probably, though, but you can still try and tell me whether it works.

It's also normal that I not be stubbornly stuck on any old theory that doesn't seem to work well enough.

DNA is the code, it is contained in the cells and every where, no matter how dirty or wet or crumpled the envelope may be, the message still remains.Cells die. DNA still lives.

It lives, but can not replicate perfectly. That's the reason humans are mortal, because inside a body, you must have almost perfect replication, and that depletes soon enough, so you die.

how come all planets follow a certain pattern?

No, they don't.

And just right where the sun and moon could give them light,

It is common that planets have a satellite.

However, such arguments are completely arbitrary and senseless, for Earth isn't so special that we should be surprised enough to conclude omnipotent entities. The argument could have been used for any planet we were on.

All the stars seem to be gathered at one place, meteroids orbiting around the sun, asteroid belts etc.

Asteroids are common in space, and even if they weren't, an asteroid best isn't anything special.

And you wanna talk about the universe?

With you? No.

Or better yet, it's simply an easily conceivable story.

I see that the edit wasn't completed. Perhaps I closed the browser or something.

Obama's ideal America, as it was portrayed to be since ages, would have been a fine place to find a World Order on. Trump has exposed that it's a worthless pit and all the effort there has been pitiful. I'd have expected more for the newly discovered continent that was brought to power, a place without any old culture. It requires, after all, a lot of effort.

Thanks to more integrated economies now, it won't take centuries to bring it back down. You people could have shined in the pages of history, but it seems like you want a smaller illusion power. prepared to lose if the things get out of control. Hiding them again won't work.

Though I'll certainly be banned here, it won't be you to do that.

That's all the hint you're getting.

He's also too old. Being elected again seems unlikely, and he's already destroyed America for what it was made to be about the purpose.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Multiple
Winning Position: I didn't know that earlier
Winning Position: Antitheist
Winning Position: What is life?
Winning Position: Which is the funniest argument for existence of a God?
Winning Position: Against the idiots who ban opinions differing from theirs - with a reply to the Defence
Winning Position: It's too...boring.

About Me

"Bring me your masters if you are too worthless to think."

Biographical Information
Name: Yeshua Christus of Nazareth
Gender: Guy
Age: 666
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: India
Religion: Atheist
Education: Post Grad
Websites: Link 1
Link 2
Link 3
A Blog of mine

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here