Porn always ended up in the hands of the younger lot one way or another. Whether it is printed or not. Kids have smart-phones now, they can view all they porn they want unsupervised. Those boys were just unlucky to get caught.

Yes take for example video games -they show tremendous violence the most infamous video game Grand Theft Auto showing rape. Shooting games in which there is endless killing. Does that make someone want to go on rampage? There are lots of extremely violent films with lots of gore in them. Child porn does not make people who view it into sexual predators who would hunt down children. The same can be said about adult porn - why are men attacking women; or women become more deviant. Or BDSM porn want people want to hurt each other, or granny porn want to chase old ladies.

A rapists may have lots porn but his actions are not determined by porn, what he does is because there is something wrong with him, he does not see the consequence of his actions. He can be someone who rapes women or children -he is a psychopath. Not everyone is a psychopath. Those who find it disgusting should not see it. All porn is disgusting for some people.

The incidence of rape will not be lessened with absence of porn and it does not increase because of it. Ending porn will not end rape, otherwise it would be best solution to all sex crimes.

Apprenticeship was considered a very good idea, children learned a trade and became professionals later in life. Present day education does not prepare children for the working environment, they also do not understand the value of money. There was never a sole earner in a family, everyone worked to survive. The system has developed in which before the man of the house was the only one working for the entire family, but as economic circumstances changed both parents worked. That too has pr oven to be a failure. In an economic crisis - parents also also lose their jobs - how is the family going to survive? The answer lies that everyone pools in - including the children. Isolating people and making them sole earners does not not help - no person can ever be sure that his or her job will continue and will continue making the same amount of money. The family as a unit makes money for itself. Part of it goes for food and shelter, the other goes buying things for oneself without depending on someone else to get them.

In earlier days children were apprentices of carpenters and tailors. Those professions have gone. With changing times, children have pr oven to be good at programming computers - just one example. Ultimately it is the value of money is what they learn. Parents can remain unemployed for prolonged periods - that is not good for the family.

The U.S.C 2257 regulation requires all porn stars be 18 years and older. This was introduced when George W Bush became president. No one said anything at that time, no one screamed censorship, now the government has more power to censor and its too late. That regulation should never have been imposed in the first place. That regulation must go.

Porn is not something everyone can do. One has to be born and bred in such an environment where sex is not something unusual or strange - it is either an accepted way of life or it is an ongoing business. It is easily assumed that prostitutes do not have children, they do have children and they get their kids into this business.

Porn is something they get into to make some extra money. It is generally assumed that completely innocent people are forced into it. Why would anyone want to take such a big risk? Get arrested for kidnapping and rape, when there are brothels who have people who know what they are required to do.

The business of making child porn belongs to the same criminal organisations which run drugs and they have become very rich. Because child porn has been criminalised - it has also become a part of their operations. Fighting the war on drugs has proven to be increasingly futile -as the drug mafia is better armed and well trained. These criminals have become so rich they can fund the campaigns of politicians. So no politician will never want to legalise drugs - they want campaign funds. Planting drugs in someone's house, is a good way to eliminate political opponents. Child porn is also not a small business operation - it is a huge one, protected with lots of armed people. So the police is fighting not only drugs but child porn at the same time.

Planting child porn in someone's computer is something which hackers can do easily, thus ruin the political career of any individual. By keeping these things illegal is just another way to destroy the reputation of anyone. There is child porn because there is a demand for it. Who are the buyers? And how many of them are there? Is the government prepared to resort to mass arrests? Such measures would only encourage bribing the police to look the other way, thus corrupting society even more. The biggest owners of child porn are police organisations, which they took from the people who had it. They use it to snare anyone interested in it.