This question can not be answered with a "ignorant" or "informed". I think there are really 3 categories, with the people in the middle forming the largest group.

There is a large group of Americans that do not pay attention to politics and are not educated enough to form coherent political views...(as evidenced by the Stern interview, Wow) Hopefully, the majority of these people will stay home on election day.

On the other end, there is a large group of people that are "plugged in" and are knowledgeable about the candidates and their policies.

In the middle, you have millions of americans that just read or listen to the headlines, forming their political views (if you can call them that, maybe inclinations would be better) based on a conversation that they had with someone at the watercooler. Busy with their everyday lives, they don't take extra time to educate themselves about the different candidates and form their own opinions. Can you blame some of these people? There is so much conflicting information about the two candidates that it is tough to figure out what is the real story.

I side with Ignorant Voters on this debate because when it comes down to it... Those americans in the middle can not be considered "Informed"

I drink what tastes good... and Bud Light dominates in the Light beer category. I don't care who makes it... as long as the taste doesn't change. FYI - Miller Lite is disgusting.

Global warming is a made up theory. We obviously need to conserve and not pollute the earth, but the idea that we are creating the climate change is not realistic.

I would think that taking Personal Responsibility would be an important factor in this debate. Nobody is saying that you should not help your neighbor in need, but there is a difference between helping someone that needs it and providing handouts to those that have learned that they don't have to work to better their situation.

I am pretty sure the gag reflex that occurs each time I sip the Miller Lite is beyond thinking for myself. Bottom Line... That shht is GROSS.

STANDARD... this debate is so standard. Bud Light is obviously the best Light Beer. You will not find a more well-rounded, tasty, less-filling, "I can drink 12 of you before a Redskins game and still look forward to a couple 20oz Bud Light drafts when I get into FedEx Field" Beer. Anyone that advocates for Miller Lite is questionable at best. Seriously, “Lite” is defined in the American heritage Dictionary as “Having Less Substance”… Not my beer. Bud Light is a true symbol of Red, White, and Blue... and everything else that is good in this country for that matter

STANDARD... this debate is so standard. Bud Light is obviously the best beer in the world. Yes, there may be some beers that taste "better" or have more flavors, etc... but you will not find a more well-rounded, tasty, less-filling, "I can drink 12 of you before a Redskins game and still look forward to a couple 20oz Bud Light drafts when I get into FedEx Field" Beer. Some will argue that Miller Lite is the winner in this conversation... and that is laughable. Bud Light is a real symbol of Red, White, and Blue... and everything else that is good in this country for that matter.