No, a fetus is connected to the mother, and it doesn't move except by instinct, is that an individual?

You start from a CELL. Which has no feelings, which evolves into a fetus, which has no feelings, then into a human, which has feelings.

Do they have their different feelings? Yes. But a fetus just moves by instinct.

Since you are such an expert, how can you prove that the fetus is moving because of its own thought, and not instinct?

Emphasis on the FLOAT. It doesn't move, the fluids move a fetus. Also, what you eat floats around your stomach. Are you arguing that if what you eat could evolve into a human, and that it gets nutrients from you, it becomes a human life?

But YOUR ear comes from a combination of your mom and your dad. Also, it is not controlled by your mom nor your dad. Does that make your ear a human life?

I am not saying that the mother gets to kill a fetus just because it relies on her, but that it is not YET a stage of human life. The fetus is illegal to kill because it WILL provide help to the society, not because it is immoral. I can even argue that it is not immoral to kill a fetus because it has no feelings.

Just because of the fact that it WILL BECOME a human life, and that it has an idea of its own, doesn't make it a human life. What defines a human life, in every dictionary, is an INDIVIDUAL, in-dividual.

The thing is, the fetus is not a human life, but rather a part of the mother, just like an ear or eye, it is connected to her, though you cannot move your ear freely, just like you cannot move a fetus freely, it is still part of the mother, or you.

I would say that it is not morally wrong. Take the case of having a lot of people around the person. Is it only not morally wrong that everyone jumps down to save him? It's their choice.