CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Killinder

Reward Points:4
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:6
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
6 most recent arguments.
2 points

Many people on both sides are better than her, she will never earn anyone's trust ever. That's just her style, to lose everyone's trust because she thinks she can do anything because of being the wife of a FORMER president.

Killinder(4) Clarified
1 point

She is allowed to have a life outside of SECTARY OF STATE (not president David) but not have them intermingle. And yes that is a requirement of the job.

Killinder(4) Clarified
1 point

She could have erased the emails from her database, and she also knew that having a personal database was against the law. And the emails are not the only thing that make me think she is not trustworthy David.

1 point

Money scandals, personal emails, 'charity' funds, the list goes on and on. Hilary Clinton is not trustworthy! With the emails, she had about 2 weeks to delete all emails that were in her opinion 'personal', what I really think is that she deleted incriminating emails so as to save her own hide. With all this 'charity money' going into her campaign, I raise the question "is she accepting more money from one person than legally allowed?". If you even have to wonder that, then it just proves that she is not trustworthy. She could have erased the emails from her database, and she also knew that having a personal database was against the law. And the emails are not the only thing that make me think she is not trustworthy David.

1 point

Money scandals, personal emails, 'charity' funds, the list goes on and on. Hilary Clinton is not trustworthy! With the emails, she had about 2 weeks to delete all emails that were in her opinion 'personal', what I really think is that she deleted incriminating emails so as to save her own hide. With all this 'charity money' going into her campaign, I raise the question "is she accepting more money from one person than legally allowed?". If you even have to wonder that, then it just proves that she is not trustworthy.

1 point

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev killed and maimed people, he should be put to death for this. If we do not punish him with death, then we will be perceived as weak by other nations. Terrorists especially. If he gets a life sentence, more attacks will follow because people will be like 'meh it's just a life sentence, let's just send old people who are close to dying,' do we really want that?

Killinder has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here