Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
We just shouldn't we are an amazing species that has adapted to eat both meat and plants, which too my knowledge no other species has ever done. To be a Vegetarian just because its killing animals or following the rules of a book or scroll is stupid. The question should be, "Should we farm animals and not give the care just so they can
be eaten", to which the answer should be no!
The first sentence is really frustrating in itself. How can you even say that we don't have morals. Of course we do, we have empathy, we know how it feels to be hurt, or we can at least imagine. If your silly book is the only reason you have morals then you don't deserve to be human. What do you say to every other religious person in the world who believes that you don't have morals because you don't follow their holy book? Do they have any sense of morality? To even say that the Bible is the only reason people have morals is stupid. People had morals before the Bible. The HUMANS who wrote the Bible must have had morals, right?
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |