Here Here! :)

Committed the Slippery Slope Fallacy much. Lol! haha

I remember that we had a report on this.

If I were to take agriculture as the platform for this debate then, definitely, there are a lot of negative effects caused by GMOs. The produce that the incorporation of these organisms to the plants causes greater quantity but an even greater depreciation of quality. There is also the question of what would be the resulting products of agri-crossbreeding between normal to modified ones.

Humans consume more, gain less and are at the risk of contracting diseases.

Support? A case similar to what I just explained happened to the Philippines not so many years ago. "BT corn" was the name if I remember correctly.

Very nice data, matter-wise you are a good debater.

However, try to flesh out your arguments in a more summarized version. I can see that you have good points in here. The narrative form just makes it hard to pinpoint.

Side notes:

Book sounds interesting :)

Pleasant dreams :)

"about a thousand years ago"... Source please? :)

And at any rate, Climate Change is a normal process of the earth to maintain its balance or ideal equilibrium state. The percentile mark you have cited is something which occurs on a gradually changing pattern.

Plus, your citation is such a ...small mark. Surely you must have some other data available? Thank you :)

Read a bit more and you will learn that Global Warming is a form of Climate Change, as is any other natural process that the earth goes through to rejuvenate itself. However, as this is a debate, logically the issue being discussed would be the ABNORMAL level of Global Warming that the earth manifests. These patterns of differentiation from the norm is where the question of MAN OR MYTH comes in.

The side you are supposed to be defending is that Global Warming is a myth.

It is common sense that Man isn't the ONLY cause of Global Warming, but the case that Man IS a cause of Global Warming brings the whole MYTH concept as something that needs to be questioned.

Gay Parenting Does Affect Children Differently, Study Finds

-- Authors Believe Gay Parents Have "Some Advantages"

Taking issue with 20 years of research conclusions that say there are no differences, two University of California sociologists recently re-examined data from 21 studies on gay parenting dating back to 1980.

The new study by two University of Southern California sociologists says children with lesbian or gay parents show more empathy for social diversity, are less confined by gender stereotypes, and are probably more likely to explore homosexual activity themselves. Writing in recent issue of the American Sociological Review, the authors say that the emotional health of the two sets of children is essentially the same.

Leaders of national gay-affirming groups said they welcomed the article, according to an Associated Press story. "I'm thrilled that they're tackling these issues," said Aimee Gelnaw, executive director of the Family Pride Coalition, who is a lesbian parent raising two children with her partner. "Of course our kids are going to be different," Gelnaw said. "They're growing up in a different social context."

Openness to Gay Relationships

Met With "Elation"

Kate Kendall, head of the San Francisco-based National Center for Lesbian Rights, also is raising two children with her partner. "There's only one response to a study that children raised by lesbian and gay parents may be somewhat more likely to reject notions of rigid sexual orientation -- that response has to be elation," Kendall said.

But Amy Desai, a policy analyst with the group Focus on the Family, said the new report is alarming in its suggestions that children of gay parents might be more open to homosexual activity. "Kids do best when they have a married mother and a married father," she said.

A Home With No Dad is Better?

The study's co-author, Judith Stacey, is a professor of contemporary gender studies. In addition to pointing out the gender differences in the two groups of children, she states that there are in fact some advantages to an all-female parental team without Dad living in the home: a female couple tends to be more involved in the children's lives and is in greater harmony in terms of parenting approaches.

Among the findings cited by the authors:

1. Compared to the daughters of heterosexual mothers, the daughters of lesbians more frequently dress, play and behave in ways that do not conform to sex-typed cultural norms. They show greater interest in activities with both masculine and feminine qualities. They have higher aspirations to occupations that are not traditionally female.

2. In terms of aggression and play, sons of lesbians behave in less traditionally masculine ways. They are likely to be more nurturing and affectionate than their counterparts in heterosexual families.

3. One study examined by the researchers indicated that a significantly greater proportion of young adult children raised by lesbians had engaged in a same-sex relationship (six of 25 interviewed) than those raised by a heterosexual mother (none of 20 interviewed).

4. Those raised by lesbian mothers were also more likely to consider a homosexual relationship.

5. Teen-age and young adult girls raised by lesbian mothers appear to be more sexually adventurous and less chaste than girls raised by heterosexual mothers. Sons, on the other hand, were somewhat less sexually adventurous and more chaste than boys raised by heterosexuals.

6. The studies indicate that sexual orientation has no measurable effect on the quality of parent-child relationships or on the mental health of children.

"These studies find no significant differences between children of lesbian and heterosexual mothers in anxiety, depression, self-esteem and numerous other measures of social and psychological adjustment," said the authors.

NARTH"s Joseph Nicolosi offered the following comments: "This paper was authored by a professor of gender studies, so it is not surprisingly that the differences on which she focused have to do with a rejection of gender conformity. Indeed, what she found makes sense -- lesbian mothers tend to have a feminizing effect on their sons, and a masculinizing effect on their daughters.

"But the question is, are these differences healthy? More research is needed to understand how a rejection of conventional gender roles can have not just a healthy and expansive, but also a constricting and negative effect on identity and psychological health.

"And despite what many gender researchers claim, research tells us that the absence of a father in the home is not, on balance, good for families."

Source:

http://www.narth.com/docs/does.html National Association for Research &n;theraphy of homosexuality

Hurt is a broad term, but if to be taken in the context of marriage the main aspect of this union are the people participating in it. Given this fact, since they choose to marry each other regardless of orientation or gender, it definitely doesn't hurt anyone.

People in contact with these gay couples might disapprove of their status but other than having their ideals or opinions contested, in no way are they distinguishably hurt per se.