Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 1 |
Debates: | 0 |
This question is poorly worded, because it is highly unlikely that you need to shoot or maim someone to deactivate their phone. In addition, framing the question with extremely violent acts, which may be unnecessary, skews the debate.
'Airlines' should not have the right to attack anyone.
There is no reason why it should be legal to attack someone.
Airline employees should have the right to use force to remove a threat to passengers, either by confiscating property, or by restraining dangerous people.
The safety procedures and requirements should be clearly outlined, and agreed to, for all passengers. If a passenger does not adhere to those procedures, and does not have emergency mitigating circumstance, the employees of that airline are justified in using necessary force to remove a threat. This is also supported, by the terms which the passenger agreed to.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |