- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
A political system is a system that opposes anarchy.
"Anarchy" however is nature's system.
Although it is not a fact IF anything makes us different to animals(the sole purpose of a political system) it is the psyche.
Society(and therefore a political system) is a consequence of the psyche,without the psyche societies wouldn't exist(note: this doesn't mean humans wouldn't live together,but a society as we know it,moral rules etc., would not exist.).
Political systems only exist because they're needed,why else?
Here is the paradox:
Political systems are consequence of human psyche.
Human Psyche makes us different than animals.
Political systems however only exist because if they wouldn't we'd behave like animals.
This proves that human nature is indeed animal.(Perhaps we're a bit more complex but our nature is still the same)
Therefore a political system contradicts nature in general(Law of the stronger one.)
Therefore a political system is paradox to human nature.
This Debate is getting too emotional,a debate should be a two sided chain of rational thoughts that lead to a conclusion(or not)
I personally think that women have the same capacity as men but because of how society has evolved(generally of course) trough out the world women do not currently have the same power.It is getting better however and will only be better in the future unless off course society returns to its primitive roots.
I can not agree with this because:
You are assuming a God could not exist because human undarstanding is increasing to proove certain religions wrong and explain things that couldn't be explained in the past.
For god to be a god:
1,He has to exist
2,He has to be superior to humans.
Science has prooved many but not all and not the most "important" religions wrong,they have simply put alternative theories to god.
Therefore science has only killed god's that never existed,they can nor proove that god doesn't exists nor proove his existance.
Since god has to exist to be god,this isn't enough to make your point valid.
Philosophy: the rational investigation of questions about existence and knowledge and ethics.
Religion: A religion is a set of beliefs and practices, often centered upon specific supernatural and moral claims about reality, the cosmos, and human nature, and often codified as prayer, ritual, or religious law.
Conclusion: Religion is part of Philosophy,Philosophy is of wider range,therefore they can not be essentially the same.
Definition of mental disease:
Any disease of the mind; the psychological state of someone who has emotional or behavioral problems serious enough to require psychiatric intervention.
Homosexuality is at most mental abnormality because of societies label of it being so.
If society didn't label this so there would no need whatsoever to psychiatric intervention(Note: most homosexuals who do request psychiatric intervention do so out of pressure, it is hard for them to live in a society that doesn't accept them,this doesn't prove need however,only social pressure.)
The essence of homosexuality in this case is as logical or illogical as that of heterosexuals and bisexuals.
Conclusion: Homosexuality can not be labeled a mental disease unless you labeled heterosexuality so as well.