Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All


Reward Points:231
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Everyone has a right to be respected as a human being, stranger, relative and what you may be. it is right in terms of politeness and good manners. Respect is right and a right that people should have. If your still not certain about respect being a right then consider having no respect as a wrong.


:: is thinking and acting in a positive way about yourself or others.

:is thinking and acting in a way that shows others you care about their feelings and their well-being.

1 point

Hey ally, I see you're not a pro life yet and we cannot support each other with that, well I might aswell try to change your beautiful mind.

Psalm 22:10 (BBE) I was in your hands even before my birth; you are my God from the time when I was in my mother's body.

'I was in my mother's body" meaning the speaker was already an invidual inside the mother's womb.

Also it zygote are a child since this pro life claim is irrefutable 'when you were a fetus you weren't parentless' KJVPrewrath , you very first existed as a zygote and as a child. Don't believe me? Alright I'll give you another point, sperm cell and the egg cell are parents of the zygote. but it's not directly the sperm cell and the egg cell that are considered as parents but the owner of that sperm cell and egg cell.

The fetus is an individual because That fetus was you KJVPrewrath. You experience being a fetus and you were not your mother's organ, fetus have its own life that is needed to be value.

As a Christian KJVPrewrather, let us value unborn children.

1 point

Before I start my argument I would like to invite marcusmoon to a definition battle, ehem this article in this link says, Zygote, fertilized egg cell that results from the union of a female gamete (egg, or ovum) with a male gamete (sperm). In the embryonic development of humans and other animals, the zygote stage is brief and is followed by cleavage, when the single cell becomes subdivided into smaller cells. i will repeat, the article said that zygote was formed by the union of sperm and egg cell, that zygote was begotten by a man through sperm cell which fits the definition of 'father'


: to become the father of (a child) : to make a woman pregnant so that she gives birth to (a child)1 a : a man who has begotten a child;

How can you call someone a child? When you beget someone


: to cause (something) to happen or exist

That man beget the zygote. If a man and a woman have procreate, that something that existed when they unite using sperm and egg cells is their child additionally, without a man the zygote can't exist.


:1 a : an unborn or recently born person

:4 a : a son or daughter of human parents

Look ,these are children who can't speak yet. Let's stop pretending.

1 point

Con death penly supporters is a double negative statement in terms of grammar. Dude,

killing a body means killing an existence of life. Killing is not ontl vandalism and harm, it is taking away life, even angelo was ressurected Steven is still wrong as of even the tortured are alive the torturers are wrong. steven's intended to kill Angelo without its consent and without sympathy so he harmed Angelo for the sake of his needs so this is not a case of manslaughter and an excusable murderer because all murderers kill for their own needs just like what Steven did. You know, I give mercy to Angelo and I call him a poor man but you call him selfish, bro, You have thought that Angelo is selfish now that he didn't kill anyone, let's put it in this way, You died suddenly because a soldier use you as a shield now do you think that's right? Oh no, your doubting condemning a murderer.It's not just a loss of life buddy, it's also harming and forcing someone to became an involuntary sacrifice Okay, another one let's put it in this way. the situation above where you are steven and you killed your only child to save yourself and your brothers then God decided to ressurect him,base on what you think what will he say to you? It's not your kindness (its okay for you to be killed) that makes it right or wrong, It's the evil intention of the murderer. He killed Angelo and he doesn't care of Angelo. If the murderer really intended to save then he would kill himself instead so the selfish one is probably Steven. People make mistakes and they shouldn't be killed for that. People change, and they shouldn't be killed for what they were like for a short period of their life Nice one bro, you really sound like a con death penaly supporter, no one learns by killing a killer and even serial killer has chance to change but I know you usually condemn murderers but in this situation you're doubting condemning a killer which you shouldn't doubt for. Actually this scenario is just base on a educational app called 'Edx' not on myself.

2 points

Hold up you idiot. / you dumb fuck? / you daft yankie doodle dickhead?/ Let me tell you something, moron Watch your language, give us clean argument to read and quit name-calling.

1 point

I was arguing that it can be favourable when achieving a positive outcome, but that it's difficult since the outcome is typically not certain.Positive outcome but using an unfair method, this scenario is comparable to the dirty players at sports who plays a dirty game for their own victory.I disagree. In the scenario you can save lives through murder. Your supporting the suspects's side not the victim and now you sound like the con-death penalty supporters.I'm not sure what you mean by this, could you explain? If you were Angelo, you wouldn't think what they done is right especially it was out of consent then I don't think they should be condemned for it. No, yes maybe they were involuntary saved by Angelo but they should pay for their action , they should'nt escape from the fact that they intenionally killed an innocent.I don't think murder is inherently badyour just saying that because you were not a victim, give empathy to those who were killed then you will understand that murder is completely wrong If you say anyone neutral or above deserves resurrection then I believe all of them should be resurrected. Smart man! but as I am trying to tell you 'murderers deserve death' ,am i wrong?

1 point

All types of physcial abuse are violation to the right of being treated with dignity, respect and sensitivity

1 point

Haha man you're not serious

1 point

Really, it's okay to kill you? Just to be sure.

1 point

Can you justify murder of one for an increased chance of survival of another?Your question was like 'kill one to save many' the answer to your question is the saying 'two wrongs cannot make a right'. Never will cannibalism and murder be a favorable action , I knew you would'nt agree on murder and cannibalism if it weren't your advantage. If ever the boat reach no land in that situation resulting to deaths of the three of you then a righteous god came to the boat and plan to ressurect from the four of you, in your opinion who would he choose? (it can be more than one)

Displaying 7 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Yes
Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: Unresolved

About Me

Biographical Information
Gender: Female
Age: 13
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: Philippines
Religion: Christian-other
Education: High School

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here