Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 105 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 77% |
Arguments: | 90 |
Debates: | 2 |
Well it may be ridiculous but the question is one OR the other. In order to conserve some space I might as well put mine here. If reproduction was possible regardless of the circumstance I believe that men would more likely have less difficulty in this scenario, as they, at least in my experience, have an easier time getting along with each other, especially without women involved (interest leads to competition etc.) Regardless, I think that both scenarios would likely lead to many social problems, and even if reproduction were possible most men would still have an interest in the non-unobtainable opposite sex.
Nothing really, I mean, some people are against embryonic stem cell research because of their beliefs, and I respect that, but I don't think that they should be dictating the well-being of many in our society just because of the beliefs of a relatively small group of people. I say we have a nationwide vote on it :P.
|